The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Granite 3.3 8B Base vs MiniCPM-SALA

MiniCPM-SALA leads the LLM Stats Score 14.4 to -0.5.

IBM · OpenBMB · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

MiniCPM-SALA leads the overall LLM Stats Score 14.4 to -0.5, ranking #236 overall.

In the 3 individual benchmarks reported for both models, MiniCPM-SALA wins 3; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Granite 3.3 8B Base

  • you are already invested in the IBM ecosystem

Choose MiniCPM-SALA

  • overall performance matters — it scores 14.4 and ranks #236 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 3 of 3 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Feb 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
-0.5
#329
14.4
#236
-0.7
#323
15.7
#221
11.1
#161
21.0
#94
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
0 of 3
3 of 3
Input price
— / M
— / M
Output price
— / M
— / M
Context window

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
Granite 3.3 8B Base
MiniCPM-SALA
-0.8#298
14.2#220
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

20 reported for Granite 3.3 8B Base · 24 for MiniCPM-SALA

3 shared

Granite 3.3 8B Base outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while MiniCPM-SALA is better at 3 benchmarks (AIME 2024, HumanEval, IFEval).

MiniCPM-SALA significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Mon Sep 21 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

1.3B diff

MiniCPM-SALA has 1.3B more parameters than Granite 3.3 8B Base, making it 16.0% larger.

IBM
Granite 3.3 8B Base
8.2Bparameters
OpenBMB
MiniCPM-SALA
9.5Bparameters
8.2B
Granite 3.3 8B Base
9.5B
MiniCPM-SALA

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Granite 3.3 8B Base supports multimodal inputs, whereas MiniCPM-SALA does not.

Granite 3.3 8B Base can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Granite 3.3 8B Base

Text
Images
Audio
Video

MiniCPM-SALA

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under Apache 2.0.

Both models share the same licensing terms, providing consistent usage rights.

Granite 3.3 8B Base

Apache 2.0

Open weights

MiniCPM-SALA

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Granite 3.3 8B Base was released on 2025-04-16, while MiniCPM-SALA was released on 2026-02-11.

MiniCPM-SALA is 10 months newer than Granite 3.3 8B Base.

Granite 3.3 8B Base

Apr 16, 2025

1.4 years ago

MiniCPM-SALA

Feb 11, 2026

7 months ago

10mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Granite 3.3 8B Base has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-04-01, while MiniCPM-SALA's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Granite 3.3 8B Base's training data extends to 2024-04-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without MiniCPM-SALA's cutoff date.

Granite 3.3 8B Base

Apr 2024

MiniCPM-SALA

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Granite 3.3 8B Base and MiniCPM-SALA side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Granite 3.3 8B Base
✓ Preferred
MiniCPM-SALA
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Granite 3.3 8B Base vs MiniCPM-SALA.

Which is better, Granite 3.3 8B Base or MiniCPM-SALA?

MiniCPM-SALA leads the LLM Stats Score 14.4 to -0.5. Granite 3.3 8B Base is made by IBM and MiniCPM-SALA is made by OpenBMB. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Granite 3.3 8B Base compare to MiniCPM-SALA in benchmarks?

Granite 3.3 8B Base scores HumanEval: 89.7%, AttaQ: 88.5%, HumanEval+: 86.1%, AIME 2024: 81.2%, HellaSwag: 80.1%. MiniCPM-SALA scores HumanEval: 95.1%, RULER 64k: 92.7%, RULER 128k: 89.4%, MBPP: 89.1%, RULER 512K: 87.1%.

What are the main differences between Granite 3.3 8B Base and MiniCPM-SALA?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (-0.5 vs 14.4), multimodal support (yes vs no). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Granite 3.3 8B Base and MiniCPM-SALA?

Granite 3.3 8B Base is developed by IBM and MiniCPM-SALA is developed by OpenBMB.