The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Granite 3.3 8B Base vs Muse Wonder Full

Muse Wonder Full leads the LLM Stats Score 52.1 to -0.6.

IBM · Meta · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Muse Wonder Full leads the overall LLM Stats Score 52.1 to -0.6, ranking #13 overall.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Granite 3.3 8B Base

  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

Choose Muse Wonder Full

  • overall performance matters — it scores 52.1 and ranks #13 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Granite 3.3 8B Base
IBM
Muse Wonder Full
Meta
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
-0.6
#345
52.1
#13
Reasoning
-0.7
#339
38.4
#71
Coding
11.0
#174
41.5
#8
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
— / M
— / M
Output price
— / M
— / M
Context window
—
—

Individual benchmarks

20 reported for Granite 3.3 8B Base · 16 for Muse Wonder Full

No common benchmarks found

Granite 3.3 8B Base and Muse Wonder Fulldon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both Granite 3.3 8B Base and Muse Wonder Full support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Granite 3.3 8B Base

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Muse Wonder Full

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Granite 3.3 8B Base is licensed under Apache 2.0, while Muse Wonder Full uses a proprietary license.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Granite 3.3 8B Base

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Muse Wonder Full

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Granite 3.3 8B Base was released on 2025-04-16, while Muse Wonder Full was released on 2026-10-12.

Muse Wonder Full is 18 months newer than Granite 3.3 8B Base.

Granite 3.3 8B Base

Apr 16, 2025

1.5 years ago

Muse Wonder Full

Oct 12, 2026

0 days ago

1.5yr newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Granite 3.3 8B Base has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-04-01, while Muse Wonder Full's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Granite 3.3 8B Base's training data extends to 2024-04-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Muse Wonder Full's cutoff date.

Granite 3.3 8B Base

Apr 2024

Muse Wonder Full

—

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Granite 3.3 8B Base and Muse Wonder Full side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Granite 3.3 8B Base
✓ Preferred
Muse Wonder Full
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Granite 3.3 8B Base vs Muse Wonder Full.

Which is better, Granite 3.3 8B Base or Muse Wonder Full?

Muse Wonder Full leads the LLM Stats Score 52.1 to -0.6. Granite 3.3 8B Base is made by IBM and Muse Wonder Full is made by Meta. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Granite 3.3 8B Base compare to Muse Wonder Full in benchmarks?

Granite 3.3 8B Base scores HumanEval: 89.7%, AttaQ: 88.5%, HumanEval+: 86.1%, AIME 2024: 81.2%, HellaSwag: 80.1%. Muse Wonder Full scores MemoryBench: 85.5%, DeepSWE 1.1: 79.0%, OSWorld 2.1 (partial): 78.4%, JobBench: 75.3%, HealthBench Professional: 62.3%.

What are the main differences between Granite 3.3 8B Base and Muse Wonder Full?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (-0.6 vs 52.1), licensing (Apache 2.0 vs Proprietary). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Granite 3.3 8B Base and Muse Wonder Full?

Granite 3.3 8B Base is developed by IBM and Muse Wonder Full is developed by Meta.

Related comparisons