The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Granite 3.3 8B Instruct vs Muse Spark Open

Muse Spark Open leads the LLM Stats Score 44.9 to 2.1. Granite 3.3 8B Instruct is 4.0x cheaper per token.

IBM · Meta · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Muse Spark Open leads the overall LLM Stats Score 44.9 to 2.1, ranking #43 overall.

On price, Granite 3.3 8B Instruct is roughly 4.0x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Muse Spark Open also accepts a larger context window (1,048,576 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Granite 3.3 8B Instruct

  • cost matters — it's about 4.0x cheaper per token

Choose Muse Spark Open

  • overall performance matters — it scores 44.9 and ranks #43 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you process long inputs — it offers a 1,048,576 token context window
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Granite 3.3 8B Instruct
IBM
Muse Spark Open
Meta
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
2.1
#339
44.9
#43
Reasoning
2.5
#328
45.2
#39
Coding
11.1
#178
33.0
#42
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
$0.50 / M
$1.25 / M
Output price
$0.50 / M
$4.25 / M
Context window
128,000
1,048,576

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
Granite 3.3 8B Instruct
Muse Spark Open
Math
2.7#301
31.6#69
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

14 reported for Granite 3.3 8B Instruct · 17 for Muse Spark Open

No common benchmarks found

Granite 3.3 8B Instruct and Muse Spark Opendon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Granite 3.3 8B Instruct costs less

For input processing, Granite 3.3 8B Instruct ($0.50/1M tokens) is 2.5x cheaper than Muse Spark Open ($1.25/1M tokens).

For output processing, Granite 3.3 8B Instruct ($0.50/1M tokens) is 8.5x cheaper than Muse Spark Open ($4.25/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Muse Spark Open is more expensive than Granite 3.3 8B Instruct.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Tue Oct 20 2026 • llm-stats.com
IBM
Granite 3.3 8B Instruct
Input tokens$0.50
Output tokens$0.50
Best providerReplicate
Meta
Muse Spark Open
Input tokens$1.25
Output tokens$4.25
Best providerTogether
Notice missing or incorrect data?

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

808.0B diff

Muse Spark Open has 808.0B more parameters than Granite 3.3 8B Instruct, making it 10100.0% larger.

IBM
Granite 3.3 8B Instruct
8.0Bparameters
Meta
Muse Spark Open
816.0Bparameters
8.0B
Granite 3.3 8B Instruct
816.0B
Muse Spark Open

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Muse Spark Open accepts 1,048,576 input tokens compared to Granite 3.3 8B Instruct's 128,000 tokens. Muse Spark Open can generate longer responses up to 1,048,576 tokens, while Granite 3.3 8B Instruct is limited to 8,192 tokens.

IBM
Granite 3.3 8B Instruct
Input128,000 tokens
Output8,192 tokens
Meta
Muse Spark Open
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output1,048,576 tokens
Tue Oct 20 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both Granite 3.3 8B Instruct and Muse Spark Open support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Granite 3.3 8B Instruct

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Muse Spark Open

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Granite 3.3 8B Instruct is licensed under Apache 2.0, while Muse Spark Open uses Muse Model License.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Granite 3.3 8B Instruct

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Muse Spark Open

Muse Model License

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Granite 3.3 8B Instruct was released on 2025-04-16, while Muse Spark Open was released on 2026-10-15.

Muse Spark Open is 18 months newer than Granite 3.3 8B Instruct.

Granite 3.3 8B Instruct

Apr 16, 2025

1.5 years ago

Muse Spark Open

Oct 15, 2026

5 days ago

1.5yr newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Granite 3.3 8B Instruct has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-04-01, while Muse Spark Open's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Granite 3.3 8B Instruct's training data extends to 2024-04-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Muse Spark Open's cutoff date.

Granite 3.3 8B Instruct

Apr 2024

Muse Spark Open

—

Provider Availability

Granite 3.3 8B Instruct is available from Replicate. Muse Spark Open is available from Together.

Granite 3.3 8B Instruct

replicate logo
Replicate
Input Price:Input: $0.50/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.50/1M

Muse Spark Open

together logo
Together
Input Price:Input: $1.25/1MOutput Price:Output: $4.25/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Granite 3.3 8B Instruct and Muse Spark Open side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Granite 3.3 8B Instruct
✓ Preferred
Muse Spark Open
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Granite 3.3 8B Instruct vs Muse Spark Open.

Which is better, Granite 3.3 8B Instruct or Muse Spark Open?

Muse Spark Open leads the LLM Stats Score 44.9 to 2.1. Granite 3.3 8B Instruct is made by IBM and Muse Spark Open is made by Meta. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Granite 3.3 8B Instruct compare to Muse Spark Open in benchmarks?

Granite 3.3 8B Instruct scores HumanEval: 89.7%, AttaQ: 88.5%, HumanEval+: 86.1%, AIME 2024: 81.2%, GSM8k: 80.9%. Muse Spark Open scores MCP Atlas: 89.2%, GPQA: 89.0%, OSWorld-Verified: 80.4%, BabyVision: 80.2%, Terminal-Bench 2.1: 76.4%.

Is Granite 3.3 8B Instruct cheaper than Muse Spark Open?

Granite 3.3 8B Instruct is 2.5x cheaper for input tokens. Granite 3.3 8B Instruct costs $0.50/M input and $0.50/M output via replicate. Muse Spark Open costs $1.25/M input and $4.25/M output via together.

What are the context window sizes for Granite 3.3 8B Instruct and Muse Spark Open?

Granite 3.3 8B Instruct supports 128K tokens and Muse Spark Open supports 1.0M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Granite 3.3 8B Instruct and Muse Spark Open?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (2.1 vs 44.9), context window (128K vs 1.0M), input pricing ($0.50 vs $1.25/M), licensing (Apache 2.0 vs Muse Model License). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Granite 3.3 8B Instruct and Muse Spark Open?

Granite 3.3 8B Instruct is developed by IBM and Muse Spark Open is developed by Meta.

Related comparisons