The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Granite 3.3 8B Instruct vs Parse

Comparing Granite 3.3 8B Instruct and Parse across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

IBM · Cohere · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Granite 3.3 8B Instruct and Parse trade strengths across price, capabilities, and technical limits. The better choice depends on the workload.

Granite 3.3 8B Instruct also accepts a larger context window (128,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Granite 3.3 8B Instruct

  • you process long inputs — it offers a 128,000 token context window
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

Choose Parse

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Aug 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Benchmark wins
Input price
$0.50 / M
— / M
Output price
$0.50 / M
— / M
Context window
128,000
8,192

Individual benchmarks

14 reported for Granite 3.3 8B Instruct · 1 for Parse

No common benchmarks found

Granite 3.3 8B Instruct and Parsedon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

5.7B diff

Granite 3.3 8B Instruct has 5.7B more parameters than Parse, making it 247.8% larger.

IBM
Granite 3.3 8B Instruct
8.0Bparameters
Cohere
Parse
2.3Bparameters
8.0B
Granite 3.3 8B Instruct
2.3B
Parse

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Granite 3.3 8B Instruct accepts 128,000 input tokens compared to Parse's 8,192 tokens. Only Granite 3.3 8B Instruct specifies output context (8,192 tokens).

IBM
Granite 3.3 8B Instruct
Input128,000 tokens
Output8,192 tokens
Cohere
Parse
Input8,192 tokens
Output- tokens
Thu Sep 03 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both Granite 3.3 8B Instruct and Parse support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Granite 3.3 8B Instruct

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Parse

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Granite 3.3 8B Instruct is licensed under Apache 2.0, while Parse uses a proprietary license.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Granite 3.3 8B Instruct

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Parse

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Granite 3.3 8B Instruct was released on 2025-04-16, while Parse was released on 2026-08-27.

Parse is 17 months newer than Granite 3.3 8B Instruct.

Granite 3.3 8B Instruct

Apr 16, 2025

1.4 years ago

Parse

Aug 27, 2026

6 days ago

1.4yr newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Granite 3.3 8B Instruct has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-04-01, while Parse's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Granite 3.3 8B Instruct's training data extends to 2024-04-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Parse's cutoff date.

Granite 3.3 8B Instruct

Apr 2024

Parse

Provider Availability

Granite 3.3 8B Instruct is available from Replicate. Parse is available from Azure, Cohere.

Granite 3.3 8B Instruct

replicate logo
Replicate
Input Price:Input: $0.50/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.50/1M

Parse

azure logo
Azure
cohere logo
Cohere
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Granite 3.3 8B Instruct and Parse side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Granite 3.3 8B Instruct
✓ Preferred
Parse
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Granite 3.3 8B Instruct vs Parse.

Which is better, Granite 3.3 8B Instruct or Parse?

Granite 3.3 8B Instruct (IBM) and Parse (Cohere) each have strengths in different areas. Compare their benchmark scores, pricing, context windows, and capabilities above to determine which fits your needs.

How does Granite 3.3 8B Instruct compare to Parse in benchmarks?

Granite 3.3 8B Instruct scores HumanEval: 89.7%, AttaQ: 88.5%, HumanEval+: 86.1%, AIME 2024: 81.2%, GSM8k: 80.9%. Parse scores ParseBench: 79.2%.

What are the context window sizes for Granite 3.3 8B Instruct and Parse?

Granite 3.3 8B Instruct supports 128K tokens and Parse supports 8K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Granite 3.3 8B Instruct and Parse?

Key differences include context window (128K vs 8K), licensing (Apache 2.0 vs Proprietary). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Granite 3.3 8B Instruct and Parse?

Granite 3.3 8B Instruct is developed by IBM and Parse is developed by Cohere.