The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber vs Granite 3.3 8B Instruct

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber leads the LLM Stats Score 42.5 to 2.6.

Google · IBM · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber leads the overall LLM Stats Score 42.5 to 2.6, ranking #45 overall.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

  • overall performance matters — it scores 42.5 and ranks #45 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

Choose Granite 3.3 8B Instruct

  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber
Google
Granite 3.3 8B Instruct
IBM
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
42.5
#45
2.6
#301
Coding
35.6
#24
11.3
#150
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
— / M
$0.50 / M
Output price
— / M
$0.50 / M
Context window
—
128,000

Individual benchmarks

4 reported for Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber · 14 for Granite 3.3 8B Instruct

No common benchmarks found

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber and Granite 3.3 8B Instructdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Granite 3.3 8B Instruct specifies input context (128,000 tokens). Only Granite 3.3 8B Instruct specifies output context (8,192 tokens).

Google
Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
IBM
Granite 3.3 8B Instruct
Input128,000 tokens
Output8,192 tokens
Thu Sep 03 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Granite 3.3 8B Instruct supports multimodal inputs, whereas Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber does not.

Granite 3.3 8B Instruct can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Granite 3.3 8B Instruct

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber is licensed under a proprietary license, while Granite 3.3 8B Instruct uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

Proprietary

Closed source

Granite 3.3 8B Instruct

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber was released on 2026-09-02, while Granite 3.3 8B Instruct was released on 2025-04-16.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber is 17 months newer than Granite 3.3 8B Instruct.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

Sep 2, 2026

0 days ago

1.4yr newer
Granite 3.3 8B Instruct

Apr 16, 2025

1.4 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Granite 3.3 8B Instruct has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-04-01, while Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Granite 3.3 8B Instruct's training data extends to 2024-04-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber's cutoff date.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

—

Granite 3.3 8B Instruct

Apr 2024

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber and Granite 3.3 8B Instruct side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber
✓ Preferred
Granite 3.3 8B Instruct
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber vs Granite 3.3 8B Instruct.

Which is better, Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber or Granite 3.3 8B Instruct?

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber leads the LLM Stats Score 42.5 to 2.6. Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber is made by Google and Granite 3.3 8B Instruct is made by IBM. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber compare to Granite 3.3 8B Instruct in benchmarks?

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber scores Gray Swan IPI Benchmark: 94.0%, CyberGym: 86.2%, Google Real-world Vulnerability Discovery: 71.0%, CWE-Bench: 47.2%. Granite 3.3 8B Instruct scores HumanEval: 89.7%, AttaQ: 88.5%, HumanEval+: 86.1%, AIME 2024: 81.2%, GSM8k: 80.9%.

What are the context window sizes for Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber and Granite 3.3 8B Instruct?

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber supports an unknown number of tokens and Granite 3.3 8B Instruct supports 128K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber and Granite 3.3 8B Instruct?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (42.5 vs 2.6), multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber and Granite 3.3 8B Instruct?

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber is developed by Google and Granite 3.3 8B Instruct is developed by IBM.

Related comparisons