Model Comparison

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview vs Nova Micro

Nova Micro significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

5 benchmarks

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview outperforms in 1 benchmarks (HumanEval), while Nova Micro is better at 4 benchmarks (DROP, GSM8k, IFEval, MMLU).

Nova Micro significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Thu Apr 16 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Cost data unavailable.

Lowest available price from all providers
Thu Apr 16 2026 • llm-stats.com
IBM
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
Input tokens$0.00
Output tokens$0.00
Best providerUnknown Organization
Amazon
Nova Micro
Input tokens$0.03
Output tokens$0.14
Best providerAWS Bedrock
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Nova Micro specifies input context (128,000 tokens). Only Nova Micro specifies output context (128,000 tokens).

IBM
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Amazon
Nova Micro
Input128,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Thu Apr 16 2026 • llm-stats.com

License

Usage and distribution terms

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview is licensed under Apache 2.0, while Nova Micro uses a proprietary license.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Nova Micro

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview was released on 2025-05-02, while Nova Micro was released on 2024-11-20.

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview is 5 months newer than Nova Micro.

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview

May 2, 2025

11 months ago

5mo newer
Nova Micro

Nov 20, 2024

1.4 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

IBM
Has open weights
Higher HumanEval score (82.4% vs 81.1%)
Amazon
Larger context window (128,000 tokens)
Higher DROP score (79.3% vs 46.2%)
Higher GSM8k score (92.3% vs 70.1%)
Higher IFEval score (87.2% vs 63.0%)
Higher MMLU score (77.6% vs 60.4%)

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
IBM
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
Amazon
Nova Micro

FAQ

Common questions about IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview vs Nova Micro

Nova Micro significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview is made by IBM and Nova Micro is made by Amazon. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview scores AttaQ: 86.1%, HumanEval: 82.4%, HumanEval+: 78.3%, GSM8k: 70.1%, IFEval: 63.0%. Nova Micro scores GSM8k: 92.3%, ARC-C: 90.2%, Translation Set1→en COMET22: 88.7%, Translation en→Set1 COMET22: 88.5%, IFEval: 87.2%.
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview supports an unknown number of tokens and Nova Micro supports 128K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.
Key differences include licensing (Apache 2.0 vs Proprietary). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview is developed by IBM and Nova Micro is developed by Amazon.