The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview vs IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview leads the LLM Stats Score 52.3 to -6.2.

Baidu · IBM · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview leads the overall LLM Stats Score 52.3 to -6.2, ranking #13 overall.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview

  • overall performance matters — it scores 52.3 and ranks #13 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Nov 2026

Choose IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview

  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview
Baidu
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
IBM
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
52.3
#13
-6.2
#407
Reasoning
50.7
#12
-6.2
#397
Coding
37.9
#20
2.8
#263
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
$0.28 / M
— / M
Output price
$1.13 / M
— / M
Context window
1,048,576
—

Individual benchmarks

13 reported for ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview · 12 for IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview

No common benchmarks found

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview and IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Previewdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

273.0B diff

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview has 273.0B more parameters than IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview, making it 3900.0% larger.

Baidu
ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview
280.0Bparameters
IBM
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
7.0Bparameters
280.0B
ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview
7.0B
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview specifies input context (1,048,576 tokens). Only ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview specifies output context (1,048,576 tokens).

Baidu
ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output1,048,576 tokens
IBM
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Thu Nov 12 2026 • llm-stats.com

License

Usage and distribution terms

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview is licensed under a proprietary license, while IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview

Proprietary

Closed source

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview was released on 2026-11-11, while IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview was released on 2025-05-02.

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview is 19 months newer than IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview.

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview

Nov 11, 2026

1 days ago

1.5yr newer
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview

May 2, 2025

1.5 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview and IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview
✓ Preferred
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview vs IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview.

Which is better, ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview or IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview?

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview leads the LLM Stats Score 52.3 to -6.2. ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview is made by Baidu and IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview is made by IBM. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview compare to IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview in benchmarks?

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview scores BrowseComp: 87.4%, DRACO: 84.9%, MCP Atlas: 84.6%, DeepSWE 1.1: 71.2%, OfficeQA Pro: 67.9%. IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview scores AttaQ: 86.1%, HumanEval: 82.4%, HumanEval+: 78.3%, GSM8k: 70.1%, IFEval: 63.0%.

What are the context window sizes for ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview and IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview?

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview supports 1.0M tokens and IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview and IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (52.3 vs -6.2), licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview and IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview?

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview is developed by Baidu and IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview is developed by IBM.

Related comparisons