The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview vs Qwen3.8 Flash

Qwen3.8 Flash leads the LLM Stats Score 49.6 to -5.2.

IBM · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Qwen3.8 Flash leads the overall LLM Stats Score 49.6 to -5.2, ranking #16 overall.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview

  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

Choose Qwen3.8 Flash

  • overall performance matters — it scores 49.6 and ranks #16 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Aug 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
IBM
Qwen3.8 Flash
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
-5.2
#341
49.6
#16
Reasoning
-5.3
#331
49.2
#16
Coding
3.0
#207
36.6
#20
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
— / M
$0.15 / M
Output price
— / M
$0.47 / M
Context window
—
1,000,000

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
Qwen3.8 Flash
Math
-5.4#307
32.6#55
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

12 reported for IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview · 22 for Qwen3.8 Flash

No common benchmarks found

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview and Qwen3.8 Flashdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

118.0B diff

Qwen3.8 Flash has 118.0B more parameters than IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview, making it 1685.7% larger.

IBM
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
7.0Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3.8 Flash
125.0Bparameters
7.0B
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
125.0B
Qwen3.8 Flash

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Qwen3.8 Flash specifies input context (1,000,000 tokens). Only Qwen3.8 Flash specifies output context (131,072 tokens).

IBM
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3.8 Flash
Input1,000,000 tokens
Output131,072 tokens
Mon Aug 31 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Qwen3.8 Flash supports multimodal inputs, whereas IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview does not.

Qwen3.8 Flash can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen3.8 Flash

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview is licensed under Apache 2.0, while Qwen3.8 Flash uses a proprietary license.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Qwen3.8 Flash

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview was released on 2025-05-02, while Qwen3.8 Flash was released on 2026-08-26.

Qwen3.8 Flash is 16 months newer than IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview.

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview

May 2, 2025

1.3 years ago

Qwen3.8 Flash

Aug 26, 2026

4 days ago

1.3yr newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview and Qwen3.8 Flash side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
✓ Preferred
Qwen3.8 Flash
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview vs Qwen3.8 Flash.

Which is better, IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview or Qwen3.8 Flash?

Qwen3.8 Flash leads the LLM Stats Score 49.6 to -5.2. IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview is made by IBM and Qwen3.8 Flash is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview compare to Qwen3.8 Flash in benchmarks?

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview scores AttaQ: 86.1%, HumanEval: 82.4%, HumanEval+: 78.3%, GSM8k: 70.1%, IFEval: 63.0%. Qwen3.8 Flash scores MathVision: 95.7%, LiveCodeBench v6: 91.9%, GPQA: 91.7%, CharXiv-R: 90.6%, RealWorldQA: 88.5%.

What are the context window sizes for IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview and Qwen3.8 Flash?

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview supports an unknown number of tokens and Qwen3.8 Flash supports 1.0M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview and Qwen3.8 Flash?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (-5.2 vs 49.6), multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (Apache 2.0 vs Proprietary). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview and Qwen3.8 Flash?

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview is developed by IBM and Qwen3.8 Flash is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.

Related comparisons