The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

IBM Granite 4.2 30B vs Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct

IBM Granite 4.2 30B leads the LLM Stats Score 24.0 to 0.7.

IBM · NVIDIA · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

IBM Granite 4.2 30B leads the overall LLM Stats Score 24.0 to 0.7, ranking #157 overall.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose IBM Granite 4.2 30B

  • overall performance matters — it scores 24.0 and ranks #157 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Aug 2026

Choose Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct

  • you are already invested in the NVIDIA ecosystem

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

IBM Granite 4.2 30B
IBM
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
NVIDIA
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
24.0
#157
0.7
#308
Reasoning
21.8
#166
0.4
#301
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
— / M
— / M
Output price
— / M
— / M
Context window
—
—

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
IBM Granite 4.2 30B
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
Math
25.5#103
7.4#256
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

18 reported for IBM Granite 4.2 30B · 11 for Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct

No common benchmarks found

IBM Granite 4.2 30B and Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instructdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

40.0B diff

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct has 40.0B more parameters than IBM Granite 4.2 30B, making it 133.3% larger.

IBM
IBM Granite 4.2 30B
30.0Bparameters
NVIDIA
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
70.0Bparameters
30.0B
IBM Granite 4.2 30B
70.0B
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct

License

Usage and distribution terms

IBM Granite 4.2 30B is licensed under Apache 2.0, while Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct uses Llama 3.1 Community License.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

IBM Granite 4.2 30B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct

Llama 3.1 Community License

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

IBM Granite 4.2 30B was released on 2026-08-25, while Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct was released on 2024-10-01.

IBM Granite 4.2 30B is 23 months newer than Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct.

IBM Granite 4.2 30B

Aug 25, 2026

1 weeks ago

1.9yr newer
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct

Oct 1, 2024

1.9 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2023-12-01, while IBM Granite 4.2 30B's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct's training data extends to 2023-12-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without IBM Granite 4.2 30B's cutoff date.

IBM Granite 4.2 30B

—

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct

Dec 2023

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against IBM Granite 4.2 30B and Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

IBM Granite 4.2 30B
✓ Preferred
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about IBM Granite 4.2 30B vs Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct.

Which is better, IBM Granite 4.2 30B or Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct?

IBM Granite 4.2 30B leads the LLM Stats Score 24.0 to 0.7. IBM Granite 4.2 30B is made by IBM and Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct is made by NVIDIA. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does IBM Granite 4.2 30B compare to Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct in benchmarks?

IBM Granite 4.2 30B scores RULER 64k: 90.0%, AIME 2025: 89.2%, HMMT25: 89.2%, RULER 128k: 81.4%, MMLU-Pro: 77.6%. Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct scores GSM8k: 91.4%, HellaSwag: 85.6%, Winogrande: 84.5%, GSM8K Chat: 81.9%, MMLU Chat: 80.6%.

What are the main differences between IBM Granite 4.2 30B and Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (24.0 vs 0.7), licensing (Apache 2.0 vs Llama 3.1 Community License). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes IBM Granite 4.2 30B and Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct?

IBM Granite 4.2 30B is developed by IBM and Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct is developed by NVIDIA.

Related comparisons