IBM Granite 4.2 30B vs Llama 3.2 11B Instruct
IBM Granite 4.2 30B leads the LLM Stats Score 24.0 to -1.1.
IBM · Meta · Updated for 2026
Which is better?
IBM Granite 4.2 30B leads the overall LLM Stats Score 24.0 to -1.1, ranking #156 overall.
In the 1 individual benchmarks reported for both models, IBM Granite 4.2 30B wins 1; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.
Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.
Choose IBM Granite 4.2 30B
- overall performance matters — it scores 24.0 and ranks #156 on LLM Stats
- your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
- you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 1 of 1 exact shared results
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped Aug 2026
Choose Llama 3.2 11B Instruct
- you want predictable pricing at $0.05/M input and $0.05/M output
At a glance
The differences that matter most.
Capability indexes
Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks
Individual benchmarks
18 reported for IBM Granite 4.2 30B · 11 for Llama 3.2 11B Instruct
IBM Granite 4.2 30B outperforms in 1 benchmarks (GPQA), while Llama 3.2 11B Instruct is better at 0 benchmarks.
IBM Granite 4.2 30B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.
Human preference
Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores
Model Size
Parameter count comparison
IBM Granite 4.2 30B has 19.4B more parameters than Llama 3.2 11B Instruct, making it 183.0% larger.
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
Only Llama 3.2 11B Instruct specifies input context (128,000 tokens). Only Llama 3.2 11B Instruct specifies output context (128,000 tokens).
Input capabilities
Documented input modalities across available providers
Llama 3.2 11B Instruct supports multimodal inputs, whereas IBM Granite 4.2 30B does not.
Llama 3.2 11B Instruct can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.
IBM Granite 4.2 30B
Llama 3.2 11B Instruct
License
Usage and distribution terms
IBM Granite 4.2 30B is licensed under Apache 2.0, while Llama 3.2 11B Instruct uses Llama 3.2 Community License.
License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.
Apache 2.0
Open weights
Llama 3.2 Community License
Open weights
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
IBM Granite 4.2 30B was released on 2026-08-25, while Llama 3.2 11B Instruct was released on 2024-09-25.
IBM Granite 4.2 30B is 23 months newer than Llama 3.2 11B Instruct.
Aug 25, 2026
6 days ago
1.9yr newerSep 25, 2024
1.9 years ago
Knowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Llama 3.2 11B Instruct has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2023-12-31, while IBM Granite 4.2 30B's cutoff date is not specified.
We can confirm Llama 3.2 11B Instruct's training data extends to 2023-12-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without IBM Granite 4.2 30B's cutoff date.
—
Dec 2023
Outputs Comparison
Judge for yourself.
Run your own prompts against IBM Granite 4.2 30B and Llama 3.2 11B Instruct side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.
FAQ
Common questions about IBM Granite 4.2 30B vs Llama 3.2 11B Instruct.