The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

IBM Granite 4.2 30B vs Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct

IBM Granite 4.2 30B leads the LLM Stats Score 24.0 to 4.5.

IBM · Mistral AI · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

IBM Granite 4.2 30B leads the overall LLM Stats Score 24.0 to 4.5, ranking #157 overall.

In the 2 individual benchmarks reported for both models, IBM Granite 4.2 30B wins 2; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose IBM Granite 4.2 30B

  • overall performance matters — it scores 24.0 and ranks #157 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 2 of 2 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Aug 2026

Choose Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct

  • you want predictable pricing at $0.07/M input and $0.14/M output

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
24.0
#157
4.5
#286
21.8
#166
4.0
#283
9.6
#159
4.8
#193
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
2 of 2
0 of 2
Input price
— / M
$0.07 / M
Output price
— / M
$0.14 / M
Context window
32,000

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
IBM Granite 4.2 30B
Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct
25.5#103
7.1#258
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

18 reported for IBM Granite 4.2 30B · 8 for Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct

2 shared

IBM Granite 4.2 30B outperforms in 2 benchmarks (GPQA, MMLU-Pro), while Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct is better at 0 benchmarks.

IBM Granite 4.2 30B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Wed Sep 02 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

6.0B diff

IBM Granite 4.2 30B has 6.0B more parameters than Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct, making it 25.0% larger.

IBM
IBM Granite 4.2 30B
30.0Bparameters
Mistral AI
Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct
24.0Bparameters
30.0B
IBM Granite 4.2 30B
24.0B
Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct specifies input context (32,000 tokens). Only Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct specifies output context (32,000 tokens).

IBM
IBM Granite 4.2 30B
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Mistral AI
Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct
Input32,000 tokens
Output32,000 tokens
Wed Sep 02 2026 • llm-stats.com

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under Apache 2.0.

Both models share the same licensing terms, providing consistent usage rights.

IBM Granite 4.2 30B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

IBM Granite 4.2 30B was released on 2026-08-25, while Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct was released on 2025-01-30.

IBM Granite 4.2 30B is 19 months newer than Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct.

IBM Granite 4.2 30B

Aug 25, 2026

1 weeks ago

1.6yr newer
Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct

Jan 30, 2025

1.6 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2023-10-01, while IBM Granite 4.2 30B's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct's training data extends to 2023-10-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without IBM Granite 4.2 30B's cutoff date.

IBM Granite 4.2 30B

Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct

Oct 2023

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against IBM Granite 4.2 30B and Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

IBM Granite 4.2 30B
✓ Preferred
Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about IBM Granite 4.2 30B vs Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct.

Which is better, IBM Granite 4.2 30B or Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct?

IBM Granite 4.2 30B leads the LLM Stats Score 24.0 to 4.5. IBM Granite 4.2 30B is made by IBM and Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct is made by Mistral AI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does IBM Granite 4.2 30B compare to Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct in benchmarks?

IBM Granite 4.2 30B scores RULER 64k: 90.0%, AIME 2025: 89.2%, HMMT25: 89.2%, RULER 128k: 81.4%, MMLU-Pro: 77.6%. Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct scores Arena Hard: 87.6%, HumanEval: 84.8%, MT-Bench: 83.5%, IFEval: 82.9%, MATH: 70.6%.

What are the context window sizes for IBM Granite 4.2 30B and Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct?

IBM Granite 4.2 30B supports an unknown number of tokens and Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct supports 32K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between IBM Granite 4.2 30B and Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (24.0 vs 4.5). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes IBM Granite 4.2 30B and Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct?

IBM Granite 4.2 30B is developed by IBM and Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct is developed by Mistral AI.