The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

IBM Granite 4.2 30B vs o1

IBM Granite 4.2 30B and o1 are closely matched at 24.0 and 21.2 on the LLM Stats Score.

IBM · OpenAI · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

IBM Granite 4.2 30B and o1 are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at 24.0 and 21.2.

The models split the 2 individual benchmarks reported for both models evenly.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose IBM Granite 4.2 30B

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Aug 2026
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

Choose o1

  • you want predictable pricing at $15.00/M input and $60.00/M output

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
24.0
#156
21.2
#177
21.8
#165
21.6
#167
9.6
#159
4.8
#192
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
1 of 2
1 of 2
Input price
— / M
$15.00 / M
Output price
— / M
$60.00 / M
Context window
200,000

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

2 shared
Index
IBM Granite 4.2 30B
o1
25.6#103
24.2#112
10.6#116
13.0#92
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

18 reported for IBM Granite 4.2 30B · 19 for o1

2 shared

IBM Granite 4.2 30B outperforms in 1 benchmarks (SWE-Bench Verified), while o1 is better at 1 benchmark (GPQA).

Both models are evenly matched across the benchmarks.

Tue Sep 01 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only o1 specifies input context (200,000 tokens). Only o1 specifies output context (100,000 tokens).

IBM
IBM Granite 4.2 30B
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
OpenAI
o1
Input200,000 tokens
Output100,000 tokens
Tue Sep 01 2026 • llm-stats.com

License

Usage and distribution terms

IBM Granite 4.2 30B is licensed under Apache 2.0, while o1 uses a proprietary license.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

IBM Granite 4.2 30B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

o1

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

IBM Granite 4.2 30B was released on 2026-08-25, while o1 was released on 2024-12-17.

IBM Granite 4.2 30B is 21 months newer than o1.

IBM Granite 4.2 30B

Aug 25, 2026

6 days ago

1.7yr newer
o1

Dec 17, 2024

1.7 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against IBM Granite 4.2 30B and o1 side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

IBM Granite 4.2 30B
✓ Preferred
o1
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about IBM Granite 4.2 30B vs o1.

Which is better, IBM Granite 4.2 30B or o1?

IBM Granite 4.2 30B and o1 are closely matched on the LLM Stats Score at 24.0 and 21.2. IBM Granite 4.2 30B is made by IBM and o1 is made by OpenAI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does IBM Granite 4.2 30B compare to o1 in benchmarks?

IBM Granite 4.2 30B scores RULER 64k: 90.0%, AIME 2025: 89.2%, HMMT25: 89.2%, RULER 128k: 81.4%, MMLU-Pro: 77.6%. o1 scores GSM8k: 97.1%, MATH: 96.4%, GPQA Physics: 92.8%, MMLU: 91.8%, MGSM: 89.3%.

What are the context window sizes for IBM Granite 4.2 30B and o1?

IBM Granite 4.2 30B supports an unknown number of tokens and o1 supports 200K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between IBM Granite 4.2 30B and o1?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (24.0 vs 21.2), licensing (Apache 2.0 vs Proprietary). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes IBM Granite 4.2 30B and o1?

IBM Granite 4.2 30B is developed by IBM and o1 is developed by OpenAI.