The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

IBM Granite 4.2 30B vs o4-mini

IBM Granite 4.2 30B and o4-mini are closely matched at 24.0 and 27.9 on the LLM Stats Score.

IBM · OpenAI · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

IBM Granite 4.2 30B and o4-mini are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at 24.0 and 27.9.

In the 3 individual benchmarks reported for both models, o4-mini wins 3; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose IBM Granite 4.2 30B

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Aug 2026
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

Choose o4-mini

  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 3 of 3 exact shared results

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
24.0
#156
27.9
#126
21.8
#165
27.9
#120
9.6
#159
12.2
#138
7.9
#124
8.0
#123
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
0 of 3
3 of 3
Input price
— / M
$1.10 / M
Output price
— / M
$4.40 / M
Context window
200,000

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

2 shared
Index
IBM Granite 4.2 30B
o4-mini
25.6#103
27.9#89
10.6#116
11.8#104
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

18 reported for IBM Granite 4.2 30B · 14 for o4-mini

3 shared

IBM Granite 4.2 30B outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while o4-mini is better at 3 benchmarks (AIME 2025, GPQA, SWE-Bench Verified).

o4-mini significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Mon Aug 31 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only o4-mini specifies input context (200,000 tokens). Only o4-mini specifies output context (100,000 tokens).

IBM
IBM Granite 4.2 30B
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
OpenAI
o4-mini
Input200,000 tokens
Output100,000 tokens
Mon Aug 31 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

o4-mini supports multimodal inputs, whereas IBM Granite 4.2 30B does not.

o4-mini can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

IBM Granite 4.2 30B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

o4-mini

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

IBM Granite 4.2 30B is licensed under Apache 2.0, while o4-mini uses a proprietary license.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

IBM Granite 4.2 30B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

o4-mini

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

IBM Granite 4.2 30B was released on 2026-08-25, while o4-mini was released on 2025-04-16.

IBM Granite 4.2 30B is 17 months newer than o4-mini.

IBM Granite 4.2 30B

Aug 25, 2026

6 days ago

1.4yr newer
o4-mini

Apr 16, 2025

1.4 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

o4-mini has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-05-31, while IBM Granite 4.2 30B's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm o4-mini's training data extends to 2024-05-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without IBM Granite 4.2 30B's cutoff date.

IBM Granite 4.2 30B

o4-mini

May 2024

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against IBM Granite 4.2 30B and o4-mini side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

IBM Granite 4.2 30B
✓ Preferred
o4-mini
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about IBM Granite 4.2 30B vs o4-mini.

Which is better, IBM Granite 4.2 30B or o4-mini?

IBM Granite 4.2 30B and o4-mini are closely matched on the LLM Stats Score at 24.0 and 27.9. IBM Granite 4.2 30B is made by IBM and o4-mini is made by OpenAI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does IBM Granite 4.2 30B compare to o4-mini in benchmarks?

IBM Granite 4.2 30B scores RULER 64k: 90.0%, AIME 2025: 89.2%, HMMT25: 89.2%, RULER 128k: 81.4%, MMLU-Pro: 77.6%. o4-mini scores AIME 2024: 93.4%, AIME 2025: 92.7%, MathVista: 84.3%, MMMU: 81.6%, GPQA: 81.4%.

What are the context window sizes for IBM Granite 4.2 30B and o4-mini?

IBM Granite 4.2 30B supports an unknown number of tokens and o4-mini supports 200K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between IBM Granite 4.2 30B and o4-mini?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (24.0 vs 27.9), multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (Apache 2.0 vs Proprietary). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes IBM Granite 4.2 30B and o4-mini?

IBM Granite 4.2 30B is developed by IBM and o4-mini is developed by OpenAI.