The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

IBM Granite 4.2 30B vs Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct

IBM Granite 4.2 30B leads the LLM Stats Score 24.0 to 2.3.

IBM · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

IBM Granite 4.2 30B leads the overall LLM Stats Score 24.0 to 2.3, ranking #156 overall.

In the 1 individual benchmarks reported for both models, IBM Granite 4.2 30B wins 1; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose IBM Granite 4.2 30B

  • overall performance matters — it scores 24.0 and ranks #156 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 1 of 1 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Aug 2026

Choose Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct

  • you want predictable pricing at $0.09/M input and $0.09/M output

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
24.0
#156
2.3
#300
21.8
#165
2.3
#290
9.6
#159
10.1
#153
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
1 of 1
0 of 1
Input price
— / M
$0.09 / M
Output price
— / M
$0.09 / M
Context window
128,000

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
IBM Granite 4.2 30B
Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct
25.6#103
5.4#263
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

18 reported for IBM Granite 4.2 30B · 15 for Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct

1 shared

IBM Granite 4.2 30B outperforms in 1 benchmarks (MMLU-Pro), while Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct is better at 0 benchmarks.

IBM Granite 4.2 30B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Tue Sep 01 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

2.0B diff

Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct has 2.0B more parameters than IBM Granite 4.2 30B, making it 6.7% larger.

IBM
IBM Granite 4.2 30B
30.0Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct
32.0Bparameters
30.0B
IBM Granite 4.2 30B
32.0B
Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct specifies input context (128,000 tokens). Only Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct specifies output context (128,000 tokens).

IBM
IBM Granite 4.2 30B
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct
Input128,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Tue Sep 01 2026 • llm-stats.com

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under Apache 2.0.

Both models share the same licensing terms, providing consistent usage rights.

IBM Granite 4.2 30B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

IBM Granite 4.2 30B was released on 2026-08-25, while Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct was released on 2024-09-19.

IBM Granite 4.2 30B is 24 months newer than Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct.

IBM Granite 4.2 30B

Aug 25, 2026

1 weeks ago

1.9yr newer
Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct

Sep 19, 2024

2.0 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against IBM Granite 4.2 30B and Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

IBM Granite 4.2 30B
✓ Preferred
Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about IBM Granite 4.2 30B vs Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct.

Which is better, IBM Granite 4.2 30B or Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct?

IBM Granite 4.2 30B leads the LLM Stats Score 24.0 to 2.3. IBM Granite 4.2 30B is made by IBM and Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does IBM Granite 4.2 30B compare to Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct in benchmarks?

IBM Granite 4.2 30B scores RULER 64k: 90.0%, AIME 2025: 89.2%, HMMT25: 89.2%, RULER 128k: 81.4%, MMLU-Pro: 77.6%. Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct scores HumanEval: 92.7%, GSM8k: 91.1%, MBPP: 90.2%, HellaSwag: 83.0%, Winogrande: 80.8%.

What are the context window sizes for IBM Granite 4.2 30B and Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct?

IBM Granite 4.2 30B supports an unknown number of tokens and Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct supports 128K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between IBM Granite 4.2 30B and Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (24.0 vs 2.3). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes IBM Granite 4.2 30B and Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct?

IBM Granite 4.2 30B is developed by IBM and Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.