The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

IBM Granite 4.2 30B vs Qwen3 Max

IBM Granite 4.2 30B and Qwen3 Max are closely matched at 24.0 and 21.8 on the LLM Stats Score.

IBM · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

IBM Granite 4.2 30B and Qwen3 Max are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at 24.0 and 21.8.

In the 4 individual benchmarks reported for both models, IBM Granite 4.2 30B wins 3; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose IBM Granite 4.2 30B

  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 3 of 4 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Aug 2026
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

Choose Qwen3 Max

  • you want predictable pricing at $0.50/M input and $5.00/M output

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
24.0
#156
21.8
#172
21.8
#165
22.0
#162
9.6
#159
11.8
#140
7.9
#124
5.0
#138
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
3 of 4
1 of 4
Input price
— / M
$0.50 / M
Output price
— / M
$5.00 / M
Context window
256,000

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
IBM Granite 4.2 30B
Qwen3 Max
25.6#103
22.2#134
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

18 reported for IBM Granite 4.2 30B · 6 for Qwen3 Max

4 shared

IBM Granite 4.2 30B outperforms in 3 benchmarks (AIME 2025, GPQA, LiveCodeBench v6), while Qwen3 Max is better at 1 benchmark (SWE-Bench Verified).

IBM Granite 4.2 30B shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

Mon Aug 31 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

970.0B diff

Qwen3 Max has 970.0B more parameters than IBM Granite 4.2 30B, making it 3233.3% larger.

IBM
IBM Granite 4.2 30B
30.0Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 Max
1.0Tparameters
30.0B
IBM Granite 4.2 30B
1000.0B
Qwen3 Max

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Qwen3 Max specifies input context (256,000 tokens). Only Qwen3 Max specifies output context (131,072 tokens).

IBM
IBM Granite 4.2 30B
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 Max
Input256,000 tokens
Output131,072 tokens
Mon Aug 31 2026 • llm-stats.com

License

Usage and distribution terms

IBM Granite 4.2 30B is licensed under Apache 2.0, while Qwen3 Max uses a proprietary license.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

IBM Granite 4.2 30B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Qwen3 Max

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

IBM Granite 4.2 30B was released on 2026-08-25, while Qwen3 Max was released on 2025-12-15.

IBM Granite 4.2 30B is 8 months newer than Qwen3 Max.

IBM Granite 4.2 30B

Aug 25, 2026

5 days ago

8mo newer
Qwen3 Max

Dec 15, 2025

8 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against IBM Granite 4.2 30B and Qwen3 Max side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

IBM Granite 4.2 30B
✓ Preferred
Qwen3 Max
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about IBM Granite 4.2 30B vs Qwen3 Max.

Which is better, IBM Granite 4.2 30B or Qwen3 Max?

IBM Granite 4.2 30B and Qwen3 Max are closely matched on the LLM Stats Score at 24.0 and 21.8. IBM Granite 4.2 30B is made by IBM and Qwen3 Max is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does IBM Granite 4.2 30B compare to Qwen3 Max in benchmarks?

IBM Granite 4.2 30B scores RULER 64k: 90.0%, AIME 2025: 89.2%, HMMT25: 89.2%, RULER 128k: 81.4%, MMLU-Pro: 77.6%. Qwen3 Max scores AIME 2025: 81.6%, t2-bench: 74.8%, SWE-Bench Verified: 69.6%, LiveCodeBench v6: 69.0%, SuperGPQA: 65.1%.

What are the context window sizes for IBM Granite 4.2 30B and Qwen3 Max?

IBM Granite 4.2 30B supports an unknown number of tokens and Qwen3 Max supports 256K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between IBM Granite 4.2 30B and Qwen3 Max?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (24.0 vs 21.8), licensing (Apache 2.0 vs Proprietary). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes IBM Granite 4.2 30B and Qwen3 Max?

IBM Granite 4.2 30B is developed by IBM and Qwen3 Max is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.