The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

IBM Granite 4.2 30B vs Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct

IBM Granite 4.2 30B leads the LLM Stats Score 23.8 to 16.4. Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct is 1.1x cheaper per token.

IBM · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

IBM Granite 4.2 30B leads the overall LLM Stats Score 23.8 to 16.4, ranking #173 overall.

In the 6 individual benchmarks reported for both models, IBM Granite 4.2 30B wins 4; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

On price, Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct is roughly 1.1x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct also accepts a larger context window (262,144 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose IBM Granite 4.2 30B

  • overall performance matters — it scores 23.8 and ranks #173 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 4 of 6 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Aug 2026

Choose Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct

  • cost matters — it's about 1.1x cheaper per token
  • you process long inputs — it offers a 262,144 token context window

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
23.8
#173
16.4
#226
21.5
#181
15.0
#229
7.1
#141
4.4
#158
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
4 of 6
2 of 6
Input price
$0.16 / M
$0.15 / M
Output price
$0.65 / M
$0.60 / M
Context window
131,072
262,144

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
IBM Granite 4.2 30B
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct
25.4#109
16.5#203
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

18 reported for IBM Granite 4.2 30B · 50 for Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct

6 shared

IBM Granite 4.2 30B outperforms in 4 benchmarks (AIME 2025, Arena-Hard v2, HMMT25, LiveCodeBench v6), while Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct is better at 2 benchmarks (GPQA, MMLU-Pro).

IBM Granite 4.2 30B shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

Tue Sep 22 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct costs less

For input processing, IBM Granite 4.2 30B ($0.16/1M tokens) is 1.1x more expensive than Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct ($0.15/1M tokens).

For output processing, IBM Granite 4.2 30B ($0.65/1M tokens) is 1.1x more expensive than Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct ($0.60/1M tokens).

In conclusion, IBM Granite 4.2 30B is more expensive than Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Tue Sep 22 2026 • llm-stats.com
IBM
IBM Granite 4.2 30B
Input tokens$0.16
Output tokens$0.65
Best providerDeepinfra
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct
Input tokens$0.15
Output tokens$0.60
Best providerDeepinfra
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

1.0B diff

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct has 1.0B more parameters than IBM Granite 4.2 30B, making it 3.3% larger.

IBM
IBM Granite 4.2 30B
30.0Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct
31.0Bparameters
30.0B
IBM Granite 4.2 30B
31.0B
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct accepts 262,144 input tokens compared to IBM Granite 4.2 30B's 131,072 tokens. Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct can generate longer responses up to 262,144 tokens, while IBM Granite 4.2 30B is limited to 131,072 tokens.

IBM
IBM Granite 4.2 30B
Input131,072 tokens
Output131,072 tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct
Input262,144 tokens
Output262,144 tokens
Tue Sep 22 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct supports multimodal inputs, whereas IBM Granite 4.2 30B does not.

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

IBM Granite 4.2 30B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under Apache 2.0.

Both models share the same licensing terms, providing consistent usage rights.

IBM Granite 4.2 30B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

IBM Granite 4.2 30B was released on 2026-08-25, while Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct was released on 2025-09-22.

IBM Granite 4.2 30B is 11 months newer than Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct.

IBM Granite 4.2 30B

Aug 25, 2026

4 weeks ago

11mo newer
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct

Sep 22, 2025

1.0 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

IBM Granite 4.2 30B is available from DeepInfra. Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct is available from DeepInfra, Novita.

IBM Granite 4.2 30B

deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.16/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.65/1M

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct

deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.15/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.60/1M
novita logo
Novita
Input Price:Input: $0.20/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.70/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against IBM Granite 4.2 30B and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

IBM Granite 4.2 30B
✓ Preferred
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about IBM Granite 4.2 30B vs Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct.

Which is better, IBM Granite 4.2 30B or Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct?

IBM Granite 4.2 30B leads the LLM Stats Score 23.8 to 16.4. IBM Granite 4.2 30B is made by IBM and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does IBM Granite 4.2 30B compare to Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct in benchmarks?

IBM Granite 4.2 30B scores RULER 64k: 90.0%, AIME 2025: 89.2%, HMMT25: 89.2%, RULER 128k: 81.4%, MMLU-Pro: 77.6%. Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct scores DocVQAtest: 95.0%, ScreenSpot: 94.7%, OCRBench: 90.3%, MMLU-Redux: 88.4%, MMBench-V1.1: 87.0%.

Is IBM Granite 4.2 30B cheaper than Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct?

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct is 1.1x cheaper for input tokens. IBM Granite 4.2 30B costs $0.16/M input and $0.65/M output via deepinfra. Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct costs $0.15/M input and $0.60/M output via deepinfra.

What are the context window sizes for IBM Granite 4.2 30B and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct?

IBM Granite 4.2 30B supports 131K tokens and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct supports 262K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between IBM Granite 4.2 30B and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (23.8 vs 16.4), context window (131K vs 262K), input pricing ($0.16 vs $0.15/M), multimodal support (no vs yes). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes IBM Granite 4.2 30B and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct?

IBM Granite 4.2 30B is developed by IBM and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.