The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

IBM Granite 4.2 30B vs Qwen3.7-Plus

Qwen3.7-Plus leads the LLM Stats Score 43.0 to 24.0.

IBM · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Qwen3.7-Plus leads the overall LLM Stats Score 43.0 to 24.0, ranking #39 overall.

In the 9 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Qwen3.7-Plus wins 9; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose IBM Granite 4.2 30B

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Aug 2026
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

Choose Qwen3.7-Plus

  • overall performance matters — it scores 43.0 and ranks #39 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 9 of 9 exact shared results

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

IBM Granite 4.2 30B
IBM
Qwen3.7-Plus
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
24.0
#156
43.0
#39
Reasoning
21.8
#165
43.4
#35
Coding
9.6
#159
31.0
#43
Agents
7.9
#124
24.6
#42
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
0 of 9
9 of 9
Input price
— / M
$0.32 / M
Output price
— / M
$1.28 / M
Context window
—
1,000,000

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

3 shared
Index
IBM Granite 4.2 30B
Qwen3.7-Plus
Math
25.6#103
39.6#17
Tool use
10.6#116
24.3#35
Long context
14.0#50
26.6#9
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

18 reported for IBM Granite 4.2 30B · 70 for Qwen3.7-Plus

9 shared

IBM Granite 4.2 30B outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Qwen3.7-Plus is better at 9 benchmarks (BFCL-V4, GPQA, IFBench, LiveCodeBench v6, MMLU-Pro, SciCode, SWE-bench Multilingual, SWE-Bench Pro, SWE-Bench Verified).

Qwen3.7-Plus significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Mon Aug 31 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Qwen3.7-Plus specifies input context (1,000,000 tokens). Only Qwen3.7-Plus specifies output context (65,536 tokens).

IBM
IBM Granite 4.2 30B
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3.7-Plus
Input1,000,000 tokens
Output65,536 tokens
Mon Aug 31 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Qwen3.7-Plus supports multimodal inputs, whereas IBM Granite 4.2 30B does not.

Qwen3.7-Plus can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

IBM Granite 4.2 30B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen3.7-Plus

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

IBM Granite 4.2 30B is licensed under Apache 2.0, while Qwen3.7-Plus uses a proprietary license.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

IBM Granite 4.2 30B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Qwen3.7-Plus

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

IBM Granite 4.2 30B was released on 2026-08-25, while Qwen3.7-Plus was released on 2026-05-31.

IBM Granite 4.2 30B is 3 months newer than Qwen3.7-Plus.

IBM Granite 4.2 30B

Aug 25, 2026

5 days ago

2mo newer
Qwen3.7-Plus

May 31, 2026

3 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against IBM Granite 4.2 30B and Qwen3.7-Plus side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

IBM Granite 4.2 30B
✓ Preferred
Qwen3.7-Plus
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about IBM Granite 4.2 30B vs Qwen3.7-Plus.

Which is better, IBM Granite 4.2 30B or Qwen3.7-Plus?

Qwen3.7-Plus leads the LLM Stats Score 43.0 to 24.0. IBM Granite 4.2 30B is made by IBM and Qwen3.7-Plus is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does IBM Granite 4.2 30B compare to Qwen3.7-Plus in benchmarks?

IBM Granite 4.2 30B scores RULER 64k: 90.0%, AIME 2025: 89.2%, HMMT25: 89.2%, RULER 128k: 81.4%, MMLU-Pro: 77.6%. Qwen3.7-Plus scores IFEval: 94.6%, MMLU-Redux: 94.5%, HMMT Feb 26: 92.9%, MRCR v2: 91.7%, OmniDocBench 1.5: 91.4%.

What are the context window sizes for IBM Granite 4.2 30B and Qwen3.7-Plus?

IBM Granite 4.2 30B supports an unknown number of tokens and Qwen3.7-Plus supports 1.0M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between IBM Granite 4.2 30B and Qwen3.7-Plus?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (24.0 vs 43.0), multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (Apache 2.0 vs Proprietary). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes IBM Granite 4.2 30B and Qwen3.7-Plus?

IBM Granite 4.2 30B is developed by IBM and Qwen3.7-Plus is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.

Related comparisons