The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

IBM Granite 4.2 3B vs Grok-1.5V

IBM Granite 4.2 3B leads the LLM Stats Score 15.6 to -0.6.

IBM · xAI · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

IBM Granite 4.2 3B leads the overall LLM Stats Score 15.6 to -0.6, ranking #213 overall.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose IBM Granite 4.2 3B

  • overall performance matters — it scores 15.6 and ranks #213 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Aug 2026
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

Choose Grok-1.5V

  • you are already invested in the xAI ecosystem

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

IBM Granite 4.2 3B
IBM
Grok-1.5V
xAI
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
15.6
#213
-0.6
#315
Reasoning
12.0
#234
0.1
#302
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
— / M
— / M
Output price
— / M
— / M
Context window
—
—

Individual benchmarks

13 reported for IBM Granite 4.2 3B · 7 for Grok-1.5V

No common benchmarks found

IBM Granite 4.2 3B and Grok-1.5Vdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Grok-1.5V supports multimodal inputs, whereas IBM Granite 4.2 3B does not.

Grok-1.5V can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

IBM Granite 4.2 3B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Grok-1.5V

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

IBM Granite 4.2 3B is licensed under Apache 2.0, while Grok-1.5V uses a proprietary license.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

IBM Granite 4.2 3B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Grok-1.5V

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

IBM Granite 4.2 3B was released on 2026-08-25, while Grok-1.5V was released on 2024-04-12.

IBM Granite 4.2 3B is 29 months newer than Grok-1.5V.

IBM Granite 4.2 3B

Aug 25, 2026

6 days ago

2.4yr newer
Grok-1.5V

Apr 12, 2024

2.4 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against IBM Granite 4.2 3B and Grok-1.5V side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

IBM Granite 4.2 3B
✓ Preferred
Grok-1.5V
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about IBM Granite 4.2 3B vs Grok-1.5V.

Which is better, IBM Granite 4.2 3B or Grok-1.5V?

IBM Granite 4.2 3B leads the LLM Stats Score 15.6 to -0.6. IBM Granite 4.2 3B is made by IBM and Grok-1.5V is made by xAI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does IBM Granite 4.2 3B compare to Grok-1.5V in benchmarks?

IBM Granite 4.2 3B scores AIME 2025: 78.3%, IFBench: 74.3%, LiveCodeBench v6: 69.7%, MMLU-Pro: 67.8%, RULER 64k: 67.5%. Grok-1.5V scores AI2D: 88.3%, DocVQA: 85.6%, TextVQA: 78.1%, ChartQA: 76.1%, RealWorldQA: 68.7%.

What are the main differences between IBM Granite 4.2 3B and Grok-1.5V?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (15.6 vs -0.6), multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (Apache 2.0 vs Proprietary). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes IBM Granite 4.2 3B and Grok-1.5V?

IBM Granite 4.2 3B is developed by IBM and Grok-1.5V is developed by xAI.

Related comparisons