IBM Granite 4.2 3B vs Grok-2
IBM Granite 4.2 3B and Grok-2 are closely matched at 15.0 and 10.9 on the LLM Stats Score. IBM Granite 4.2 3B is 76.2x cheaper per token.
IBM · xAI · Updated for 2026
Which is better?
IBM Granite 4.2 3B and Grok-2 are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at 15.0 and 10.9.
In the 2 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Grok-2 wins 2; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.
On price, IBM Granite 4.2 3B is roughly 76.2x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.
IBM Granite 4.2 3B also accepts a larger context window (131,072 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.
Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.
Choose IBM Granite 4.2 3B
- cost matters — it's about 76.2x cheaper per token
- you process long inputs — it offers a 131,072 token context window
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped Aug 2026
- you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune
Choose Grok-2
- you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 2 of 2 exact shared results
At a glance
The differences that matter most.
Capability indexes
Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks
Individual benchmarks
13 reported for IBM Granite 4.2 3B · 8 for Grok-2
IBM Granite 4.2 3B outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Grok-2 is better at 2 benchmarks (GPQA, MMLU-Pro).
Grok-2 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.
Human preference
Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
For input processing, IBM Granite 4.2 3B ($0.03/1M tokens) is 66.7x cheaper than Grok-2 ($2.00/1M tokens).
For output processing, IBM Granite 4.2 3B ($0.12/1M tokens) is 83.3x cheaper than Grok-2 ($10.00/1M tokens).
In conclusion, Grok-2 is more expensive than IBM Granite 4.2 3B.*
* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
IBM Granite 4.2 3B accepts 131,072 input tokens compared to Grok-2's 128,000 tokens. IBM Granite 4.2 3B can generate longer responses up to 131,072 tokens, while Grok-2 is limited to 8,000 tokens.
Input capabilities
Documented input modalities across available providers
Grok-2 supports multimodal inputs, whereas IBM Granite 4.2 3B does not.
Grok-2 can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.
IBM Granite 4.2 3B
Grok-2
License
Usage and distribution terms
IBM Granite 4.2 3B is licensed under Apache 2.0, while Grok-2 uses a proprietary license.
License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.
Apache 2.0
Open weights
Proprietary
Closed source
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
IBM Granite 4.2 3B was released on 2026-08-25, while Grok-2 was released on 2024-08-13.
IBM Granite 4.2 3B is 25 months newer than Grok-2.
Aug 25, 2026
1 months ago
2.0yr newerAug 13, 2024
2.2 years ago
Knowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.
Unable to compare the recency of their training data.
Provider Availability
IBM Granite 4.2 3B is available from DeepInfra. Grok-2 is available from xAI.
IBM Granite 4.2 3B
Grok-2
Outputs Comparison
Judge for yourself.
Run your own prompts against IBM Granite 4.2 3B and Grok-2 side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.
FAQ
Common questions about IBM Granite 4.2 3B vs Grok-2.