The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

IBM Granite 4.2 3B vs Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)

Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) leads the LLM Stats Score 21.8 to 15.0.

IBM · NVIDIA · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) leads the overall LLM Stats Score 21.8 to 15.0, ranking #203 overall.

In the 3 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) wins 3; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose IBM Granite 4.2 3B

  • you want predictable pricing at $0.03/M input and $0.12/M output

Choose Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)

  • overall performance matters — it scores 21.8 and ranks #203 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 3 of 3 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

IBM Granite 4.2 3B
IBM
Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)
NVIDIA
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
15.0
#256
21.8
#203
Reasoning
11.3
#275
19.6
#216
Coding
-7.9
#287
2.8
#244
Agents
1.6
#193
-1.8
#203
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
0 of 3
3 of 3
Input price
$0.03 / M
— / M
Output price
$0.12 / M
— / M
Context window
131,072
—

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

2 shared
Index
IBM Granite 4.2 3B
Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)
Math
13.3#239
12.1#246
Tool use
2.5#186
-2.2#206
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

13 reported for IBM Granite 4.2 3B · 10 for Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)

3 shared

IBM Granite 4.2 3B outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) is better at 3 benchmarks (GPQA, IFBench, SciCode).

Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Thu Oct 22 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

1.0B diff

Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) has 1.0B more parameters than IBM Granite 4.2 3B, making it 33.3% larger.

IBM
IBM Granite 4.2 3B
3.0Bparameters
NVIDIA
Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)
4.0Bparameters
3.0B
IBM Granite 4.2 3B
4.0B
Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only IBM Granite 4.2 3B specifies input context (131,072 tokens). Only IBM Granite 4.2 3B specifies output context (131,072 tokens).

IBM
IBM Granite 4.2 3B
Input131,072 tokens
Output131,072 tokens
NVIDIA
Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Thu Oct 22 2026 • llm-stats.com

License

Usage and distribution terms

IBM Granite 4.2 3B is licensed under Apache 2.0, while Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) uses OpenMDW License v1.1.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

IBM Granite 4.2 3B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)

OpenMDW License v1.1

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

IBM Granite 4.2 3B was released on 2026-08-25, while Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) was released on 2026-10-16.

Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) is 2 months newer than IBM Granite 4.2 3B.

IBM Granite 4.2 3B

Aug 25, 2026

1 months ago

Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)

Oct 16, 2026

4 days ago

1mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against IBM Granite 4.2 3B and Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

IBM Granite 4.2 3B
✓ Preferred
Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about IBM Granite 4.2 3B vs Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B).

Which is better, IBM Granite 4.2 3B or Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)?

Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) leads the LLM Stats Score 21.8 to 15.0. IBM Granite 4.2 3B is made by IBM and Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) is made by NVIDIA. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does IBM Granite 4.2 3B compare to Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) in benchmarks?

IBM Granite 4.2 3B scores AIME 2025: 78.3%, IFBench: 74.3%, LiveCodeBench v6: 69.7%, MMLU-Pro: 67.8%, RULER 64k: 67.5%. Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) scores IFBench: 77.9%, GPQA: 72.4%, AA-LCR: 71.0%, SWE-Bench Verified: 59.5%, SciCode: 34.9%.

What are the context window sizes for IBM Granite 4.2 3B and Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)?

IBM Granite 4.2 3B supports 131K tokens and Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between IBM Granite 4.2 3B and Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (15.0 vs 21.8), licensing (Apache 2.0 vs OpenMDW License v1.1). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes IBM Granite 4.2 3B and Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)?

IBM Granite 4.2 3B is developed by IBM and Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) is developed by NVIDIA.

Related comparisons