The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

IBM Granite 4.2 3B vs Llama 4 Scout

IBM Granite 4.2 3B leads the LLM Stats Score 15.6 to 8.1.

IBM · Meta · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

IBM Granite 4.2 3B leads the overall LLM Stats Score 15.6 to 8.1, ranking #213 overall.

In the 2 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Llama 4 Scout wins 2; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose IBM Granite 4.2 3B

  • overall performance matters — it scores 15.6 and ranks #213 on LLM Stats
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Aug 2026

Choose Llama 4 Scout

  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 2 of 2 exact shared results

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
15.6
#213
8.1
#267
12.0
#234
6.8
#269
-6.7
#247
0.5
#226
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
0 of 2
2 of 2
Input price
— / M
$0.08 / M
Output price
— / M
$0.30 / M
Context window
10,000,000

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
IBM Granite 4.2 3B
Llama 4 Scout
13.7#216
13.1#221
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

13 reported for IBM Granite 4.2 3B · 12 for Llama 4 Scout

2 shared

IBM Granite 4.2 3B outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Llama 4 Scout is better at 2 benchmarks (GPQA, MMLU-Pro).

Llama 4 Scout significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Mon Aug 31 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

106.0B diff

Llama 4 Scout has 106.0B more parameters than IBM Granite 4.2 3B, making it 3533.3% larger.

IBM
IBM Granite 4.2 3B
3.0Bparameters
Meta
Llama 4 Scout
109.0Bparameters
3.0B
IBM Granite 4.2 3B
109.0B
Llama 4 Scout

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Llama 4 Scout specifies input context (10,000,000 tokens). Only Llama 4 Scout specifies output context (10,000,000 tokens).

IBM
IBM Granite 4.2 3B
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Meta
Llama 4 Scout
Input10,000,000 tokens
Output10,000,000 tokens
Mon Aug 31 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Llama 4 Scout supports multimodal inputs, whereas IBM Granite 4.2 3B does not.

Llama 4 Scout can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

IBM Granite 4.2 3B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Llama 4 Scout

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

IBM Granite 4.2 3B is licensed under Apache 2.0, while Llama 4 Scout uses Llama 4 Community License Agreement.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

IBM Granite 4.2 3B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Llama 4 Scout

Llama 4 Community License Agreement

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

IBM Granite 4.2 3B was released on 2026-08-25, while Llama 4 Scout was released on 2025-04-05.

IBM Granite 4.2 3B is 17 months newer than Llama 4 Scout.

IBM Granite 4.2 3B

Aug 25, 2026

6 days ago

1.4yr newer
Llama 4 Scout

Apr 5, 2025

1.4 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against IBM Granite 4.2 3B and Llama 4 Scout side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

IBM Granite 4.2 3B
✓ Preferred
Llama 4 Scout
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about IBM Granite 4.2 3B vs Llama 4 Scout.

Which is better, IBM Granite 4.2 3B or Llama 4 Scout?

IBM Granite 4.2 3B leads the LLM Stats Score 15.6 to 8.1. IBM Granite 4.2 3B is made by IBM and Llama 4 Scout is made by Meta. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does IBM Granite 4.2 3B compare to Llama 4 Scout in benchmarks?

IBM Granite 4.2 3B scores AIME 2025: 78.3%, IFBench: 74.3%, LiveCodeBench v6: 69.7%, MMLU-Pro: 67.8%, RULER 64k: 67.5%. Llama 4 Scout scores DocVQA: 94.4%, MGSM: 90.6%, ChartQA: 88.8%, MMLU: 79.6%, MMLU-Pro: 74.3%.

What are the context window sizes for IBM Granite 4.2 3B and Llama 4 Scout?

IBM Granite 4.2 3B supports an unknown number of tokens and Llama 4 Scout supports 10.0M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between IBM Granite 4.2 3B and Llama 4 Scout?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (15.6 vs 8.1), multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (Apache 2.0 vs Llama 4 Community License Agreement). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes IBM Granite 4.2 3B and Llama 4 Scout?

IBM Granite 4.2 3B is developed by IBM and Llama 4 Scout is developed by Meta.