The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

IBM Granite 4.2 30B vs Llama 4 Scout

IBM Granite 4.2 30B leads the LLM Stats Score 24.0 to 8.1.

IBM · Meta · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

IBM Granite 4.2 30B leads the overall LLM Stats Score 24.0 to 8.1, ranking #156 overall.

In the 2 individual benchmarks reported for both models, IBM Granite 4.2 30B wins 2; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose IBM Granite 4.2 30B

  • overall performance matters — it scores 24.0 and ranks #156 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 2 of 2 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Aug 2026

Choose Llama 4 Scout

  • you want predictable pricing at $0.08/M input and $0.30/M output

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
24.0
#156
8.1
#267
21.8
#165
6.8
#269
9.6
#159
0.5
#226
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
2 of 2
0 of 2
Input price
— / M
$0.08 / M
Output price
— / M
$0.30 / M
Context window
10,000,000

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
IBM Granite 4.2 30B
Llama 4 Scout
25.6#103
13.1#221
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

18 reported for IBM Granite 4.2 30B · 12 for Llama 4 Scout

2 shared

IBM Granite 4.2 30B outperforms in 2 benchmarks (GPQA, MMLU-Pro), while Llama 4 Scout is better at 0 benchmarks.

IBM Granite 4.2 30B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Mon Aug 31 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

79.0B diff

Llama 4 Scout has 79.0B more parameters than IBM Granite 4.2 30B, making it 263.3% larger.

IBM
IBM Granite 4.2 30B
30.0Bparameters
Meta
Llama 4 Scout
109.0Bparameters
30.0B
IBM Granite 4.2 30B
109.0B
Llama 4 Scout

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Llama 4 Scout specifies input context (10,000,000 tokens). Only Llama 4 Scout specifies output context (10,000,000 tokens).

IBM
IBM Granite 4.2 30B
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Meta
Llama 4 Scout
Input10,000,000 tokens
Output10,000,000 tokens
Mon Aug 31 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Llama 4 Scout supports multimodal inputs, whereas IBM Granite 4.2 30B does not.

Llama 4 Scout can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

IBM Granite 4.2 30B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Llama 4 Scout

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

IBM Granite 4.2 30B is licensed under Apache 2.0, while Llama 4 Scout uses Llama 4 Community License Agreement.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

IBM Granite 4.2 30B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Llama 4 Scout

Llama 4 Community License Agreement

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

IBM Granite 4.2 30B was released on 2026-08-25, while Llama 4 Scout was released on 2025-04-05.

IBM Granite 4.2 30B is 17 months newer than Llama 4 Scout.

IBM Granite 4.2 30B

Aug 25, 2026

6 days ago

1.4yr newer
Llama 4 Scout

Apr 5, 2025

1.4 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against IBM Granite 4.2 30B and Llama 4 Scout side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

IBM Granite 4.2 30B
✓ Preferred
Llama 4 Scout
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about IBM Granite 4.2 30B vs Llama 4 Scout.

Which is better, IBM Granite 4.2 30B or Llama 4 Scout?

IBM Granite 4.2 30B leads the LLM Stats Score 24.0 to 8.1. IBM Granite 4.2 30B is made by IBM and Llama 4 Scout is made by Meta. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does IBM Granite 4.2 30B compare to Llama 4 Scout in benchmarks?

IBM Granite 4.2 30B scores RULER 64k: 90.0%, AIME 2025: 89.2%, HMMT25: 89.2%, RULER 128k: 81.4%, MMLU-Pro: 77.6%. Llama 4 Scout scores DocVQA: 94.4%, MGSM: 90.6%, ChartQA: 88.8%, MMLU: 79.6%, MMLU-Pro: 74.3%.

What are the context window sizes for IBM Granite 4.2 30B and Llama 4 Scout?

IBM Granite 4.2 30B supports an unknown number of tokens and Llama 4 Scout supports 10.0M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between IBM Granite 4.2 30B and Llama 4 Scout?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (24.0 vs 8.1), multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (Apache 2.0 vs Llama 4 Community License Agreement). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes IBM Granite 4.2 30B and Llama 4 Scout?

IBM Granite 4.2 30B is developed by IBM and Llama 4 Scout is developed by Meta.