The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

IBM Granite 4.2 3B vs Ministral 3 (8B Reasoning 2512)

IBM Granite 4.2 3B and Ministral 3 (8B Reasoning 2512) are closely matched at 15.6 and 16.6 on the LLM Stats Score.

IBM · Mistral AI · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

IBM Granite 4.2 3B and Ministral 3 (8B Reasoning 2512) are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at 15.6 and 16.6.

In the 2 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Ministral 3 (8B Reasoning 2512) wins 2; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose IBM Granite 4.2 3B

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Aug 2026

Choose Ministral 3 (8B Reasoning 2512)

  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 2 of 2 exact shared results

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
15.6
#213
16.6
#206
12.0
#234
16.7
#198
-6.7
#247
9.1
#164
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
0 of 2
2 of 2
Input price
— / M
$0.15 / M
Output price
— / M
$0.15 / M
Context window
262,100

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
IBM Granite 4.2 3B
Ministral 3 (8B Reasoning 2512)
13.7#216
17.1#190
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

13 reported for IBM Granite 4.2 3B · 4 for Ministral 3 (8B Reasoning 2512)

2 shared

IBM Granite 4.2 3B outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Ministral 3 (8B Reasoning 2512) is better at 2 benchmarks (AIME 2025, GPQA).

Ministral 3 (8B Reasoning 2512) significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Mon Aug 31 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

5.0B diff

Ministral 3 (8B Reasoning 2512) has 5.0B more parameters than IBM Granite 4.2 3B, making it 166.7% larger.

IBM
IBM Granite 4.2 3B
3.0Bparameters
Mistral AI
Ministral 3 (8B Reasoning 2512)
8.0Bparameters
3.0B
IBM Granite 4.2 3B
8.0B
Ministral 3 (8B Reasoning 2512)

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Ministral 3 (8B Reasoning 2512) specifies input context (262,100 tokens). Only Ministral 3 (8B Reasoning 2512) specifies output context (262,100 tokens).

IBM
IBM Granite 4.2 3B
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Mistral AI
Ministral 3 (8B Reasoning 2512)
Input262,100 tokens
Output262,100 tokens
Mon Aug 31 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Ministral 3 (8B Reasoning 2512) supports multimodal inputs, whereas IBM Granite 4.2 3B does not.

Ministral 3 (8B Reasoning 2512) can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

IBM Granite 4.2 3B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Ministral 3 (8B Reasoning 2512)

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under Apache 2.0.

Both models share the same licensing terms, providing consistent usage rights.

IBM Granite 4.2 3B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Ministral 3 (8B Reasoning 2512)

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

IBM Granite 4.2 3B was released on 2026-08-25, while Ministral 3 (8B Reasoning 2512) was released on 2025-12-04.

IBM Granite 4.2 3B is 9 months newer than Ministral 3 (8B Reasoning 2512).

IBM Granite 4.2 3B

Aug 25, 2026

5 days ago

8mo newer
Ministral 3 (8B Reasoning 2512)

Dec 4, 2025

8 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against IBM Granite 4.2 3B and Ministral 3 (8B Reasoning 2512) side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

IBM Granite 4.2 3B
✓ Preferred
Ministral 3 (8B Reasoning 2512)
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about IBM Granite 4.2 3B vs Ministral 3 (8B Reasoning 2512).

Which is better, IBM Granite 4.2 3B or Ministral 3 (8B Reasoning 2512)?

IBM Granite 4.2 3B and Ministral 3 (8B Reasoning 2512) are closely matched on the LLM Stats Score at 15.6 and 16.6. IBM Granite 4.2 3B is made by IBM and Ministral 3 (8B Reasoning 2512) is made by Mistral AI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does IBM Granite 4.2 3B compare to Ministral 3 (8B Reasoning 2512) in benchmarks?

IBM Granite 4.2 3B scores AIME 2025: 78.3%, IFBench: 74.3%, LiveCodeBench v6: 69.7%, MMLU-Pro: 67.8%, RULER 64k: 67.5%. Ministral 3 (8B Reasoning 2512) scores AIME 2024: 86.0%, AIME 2025: 78.7%, GPQA: 66.8%, LiveCodeBench: 61.6%.

What are the context window sizes for IBM Granite 4.2 3B and Ministral 3 (8B Reasoning 2512)?

IBM Granite 4.2 3B supports an unknown number of tokens and Ministral 3 (8B Reasoning 2512) supports 262K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between IBM Granite 4.2 3B and Ministral 3 (8B Reasoning 2512)?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (15.6 vs 16.6), multimodal support (no vs yes). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes IBM Granite 4.2 3B and Ministral 3 (8B Reasoning 2512)?

IBM Granite 4.2 3B is developed by IBM and Ministral 3 (8B Reasoning 2512) is developed by Mistral AI.