The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

IBM Granite 4.2 3B vs Qwen2.5 7B Instruct

IBM Granite 4.2 3B leads the LLM Stats Score 15.6 to 2.7.

IBM · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

IBM Granite 4.2 3B leads the overall LLM Stats Score 15.6 to 2.7, ranking #213 overall.

In the 2 individual benchmarks reported for both models, IBM Granite 4.2 3B wins 2; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose IBM Granite 4.2 3B

  • overall performance matters — it scores 15.6 and ranks #213 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 2 of 2 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Aug 2026

Choose Qwen2.5 7B Instruct

  • you want predictable pricing at $0.30/M input and $0.30/M output

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
15.6
#213
2.7
#296
12.0
#234
2.9
#289
-6.7
#247
3.2
#205
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
2 of 2
0 of 2
Input price
— / M
$0.30 / M
Output price
— / M
$0.30 / M
Context window
131,072

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
IBM Granite 4.2 3B
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
13.7#216
8.5#250
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

13 reported for IBM Granite 4.2 3B · 14 for Qwen2.5 7B Instruct

2 shared

IBM Granite 4.2 3B outperforms in 2 benchmarks (GPQA, MMLU-Pro), while Qwen2.5 7B Instruct is better at 0 benchmarks.

IBM Granite 4.2 3B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Mon Aug 31 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

4.6B diff

Qwen2.5 7B Instruct has 4.6B more parameters than IBM Granite 4.2 3B, making it 153.7% larger.

IBM
IBM Granite 4.2 3B
3.0Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
7.6Bparameters
3.0B
IBM Granite 4.2 3B
7.6B
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Qwen2.5 7B Instruct specifies input context (131,072 tokens). Only Qwen2.5 7B Instruct specifies output context (8,192 tokens).

IBM
IBM Granite 4.2 3B
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
Input131,072 tokens
Output8,192 tokens
Mon Aug 31 2026 • llm-stats.com

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under Apache 2.0.

Both models share the same licensing terms, providing consistent usage rights.

IBM Granite 4.2 3B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Qwen2.5 7B Instruct

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

IBM Granite 4.2 3B was released on 2026-08-25, while Qwen2.5 7B Instruct was released on 2024-09-19.

IBM Granite 4.2 3B is 24 months newer than Qwen2.5 7B Instruct.

IBM Granite 4.2 3B

Aug 25, 2026

6 days ago

1.9yr newer
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct

Sep 19, 2024

1.9 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against IBM Granite 4.2 3B and Qwen2.5 7B Instruct side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

IBM Granite 4.2 3B
✓ Preferred
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about IBM Granite 4.2 3B vs Qwen2.5 7B Instruct.

Which is better, IBM Granite 4.2 3B or Qwen2.5 7B Instruct?

IBM Granite 4.2 3B leads the LLM Stats Score 15.6 to 2.7. IBM Granite 4.2 3B is made by IBM and Qwen2.5 7B Instruct is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does IBM Granite 4.2 3B compare to Qwen2.5 7B Instruct in benchmarks?

IBM Granite 4.2 3B scores AIME 2025: 78.3%, IFBench: 74.3%, LiveCodeBench v6: 69.7%, MMLU-Pro: 67.8%, RULER 64k: 67.5%. Qwen2.5 7B Instruct scores GSM8k: 91.6%, MT-Bench: 87.5%, HumanEval: 84.8%, MBPP: 79.2%, MATH: 75.5%.

What are the context window sizes for IBM Granite 4.2 3B and Qwen2.5 7B Instruct?

IBM Granite 4.2 3B supports an unknown number of tokens and Qwen2.5 7B Instruct supports 131K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between IBM Granite 4.2 3B and Qwen2.5 7B Instruct?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (15.6 vs 2.7). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes IBM Granite 4.2 3B and Qwen2.5 7B Instruct?

IBM Granite 4.2 3B is developed by IBM and Qwen2.5 7B Instruct is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.