The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

IBM Granite 4.2 30B vs Qwen2.5 7B Instruct

IBM Granite 4.2 30B leads the LLM Stats Score 24.0 to 2.7.

IBM · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

IBM Granite 4.2 30B leads the overall LLM Stats Score 24.0 to 2.7, ranking #156 overall.

In the 2 individual benchmarks reported for both models, IBM Granite 4.2 30B wins 2; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose IBM Granite 4.2 30B

  • overall performance matters — it scores 24.0 and ranks #156 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 2 of 2 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Aug 2026

Choose Qwen2.5 7B Instruct

  • you want predictable pricing at $0.30/M input and $0.30/M output

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
24.0
#156
2.7
#296
21.8
#165
2.9
#289
9.6
#159
3.2
#205
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
2 of 2
0 of 2
Input price
— / M
$0.30 / M
Output price
— / M
$0.30 / M
Context window
131,072

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
IBM Granite 4.2 30B
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
25.6#103
8.5#250
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

18 reported for IBM Granite 4.2 30B · 14 for Qwen2.5 7B Instruct

2 shared

IBM Granite 4.2 30B outperforms in 2 benchmarks (GPQA, MMLU-Pro), while Qwen2.5 7B Instruct is better at 0 benchmarks.

IBM Granite 4.2 30B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Mon Aug 31 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

22.4B diff

IBM Granite 4.2 30B has 22.4B more parameters than Qwen2.5 7B Instruct, making it 294.2% larger.

IBM
IBM Granite 4.2 30B
30.0Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
7.6Bparameters
30.0B
IBM Granite 4.2 30B
7.6B
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Qwen2.5 7B Instruct specifies input context (131,072 tokens). Only Qwen2.5 7B Instruct specifies output context (8,192 tokens).

IBM
IBM Granite 4.2 30B
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
Input131,072 tokens
Output8,192 tokens
Mon Aug 31 2026 • llm-stats.com

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under Apache 2.0.

Both models share the same licensing terms, providing consistent usage rights.

IBM Granite 4.2 30B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Qwen2.5 7B Instruct

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

IBM Granite 4.2 30B was released on 2026-08-25, while Qwen2.5 7B Instruct was released on 2024-09-19.

IBM Granite 4.2 30B is 24 months newer than Qwen2.5 7B Instruct.

IBM Granite 4.2 30B

Aug 25, 2026

6 days ago

1.9yr newer
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct

Sep 19, 2024

1.9 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against IBM Granite 4.2 30B and Qwen2.5 7B Instruct side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

IBM Granite 4.2 30B
✓ Preferred
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about IBM Granite 4.2 30B vs Qwen2.5 7B Instruct.

Which is better, IBM Granite 4.2 30B or Qwen2.5 7B Instruct?

IBM Granite 4.2 30B leads the LLM Stats Score 24.0 to 2.7. IBM Granite 4.2 30B is made by IBM and Qwen2.5 7B Instruct is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does IBM Granite 4.2 30B compare to Qwen2.5 7B Instruct in benchmarks?

IBM Granite 4.2 30B scores RULER 64k: 90.0%, AIME 2025: 89.2%, HMMT25: 89.2%, RULER 128k: 81.4%, MMLU-Pro: 77.6%. Qwen2.5 7B Instruct scores GSM8k: 91.6%, MT-Bench: 87.5%, HumanEval: 84.8%, MBPP: 79.2%, MATH: 75.5%.

What are the context window sizes for IBM Granite 4.2 30B and Qwen2.5 7B Instruct?

IBM Granite 4.2 30B supports an unknown number of tokens and Qwen2.5 7B Instruct supports 131K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between IBM Granite 4.2 30B and Qwen2.5 7B Instruct?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (24.0 vs 2.7). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes IBM Granite 4.2 30B and Qwen2.5 7B Instruct?

IBM Granite 4.2 30B is developed by IBM and Qwen2.5 7B Instruct is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.