The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Claude 3.5 Haiku vs Grok-1.5V

Claude 3.5 Haiku and Grok-1.5V are closely matched at 5.8 and -0.3 on the LLM Stats Score.

Anthropic · xAI · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Claude 3.5 Haiku and Grok-1.5V are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at 5.8 and -0.3.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Claude 3.5 Haiku

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2024

Choose Grok-1.5V

  • you are already invested in the xAI ecosystem

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
5.8
#276
-0.3
#310
6.0
#274
0.3
#298
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
Input price
$0.80 / M
— / M
Output price
$4.00 / M
— / M
Context window
200,000

Individual benchmarks

9 reported for Claude 3.5 Haiku · 7 for Grok-1.5V

No common benchmarks found

Claude 3.5 Haiku and Grok-1.5Vdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Claude 3.5 Haiku specifies input context (200,000 tokens). Only Claude 3.5 Haiku specifies output context (200,000 tokens).

Anthropic
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Input200,000 tokens
Output200,000 tokens
xAI
Grok-1.5V
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Sun Aug 30 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Grok-1.5V supports multimodal inputs, whereas Claude 3.5 Haiku does not.

Grok-1.5V can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Claude 3.5 Haiku

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Grok-1.5V

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Claude 3.5 Haiku

Proprietary

Closed source

Grok-1.5V

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Claude 3.5 Haiku was released on 2024-10-22, while Grok-1.5V was released on 2024-04-12.

Claude 3.5 Haiku is 6 months newer than Grok-1.5V.

Claude 3.5 Haiku

Oct 22, 2024

1.9 years ago

6mo newer
Grok-1.5V

Apr 12, 2024

2.4 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Claude 3.5 Haiku and Grok-1.5V side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Claude 3.5 Haiku
✓ Preferred
Grok-1.5V
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Claude 3.5 Haiku vs Grok-1.5V.

Which is better, Claude 3.5 Haiku or Grok-1.5V?

Claude 3.5 Haiku and Grok-1.5V are closely matched on the LLM Stats Score at 5.8 and -0.3. Claude 3.5 Haiku is made by Anthropic and Grok-1.5V is made by xAI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Claude 3.5 Haiku compare to Grok-1.5V in benchmarks?

Claude 3.5 Haiku scores HumanEval: 88.1%, MGSM: 85.6%, DROP: 83.1%, MATH: 69.4%, MMLU-Pro: 65.0%. Grok-1.5V scores AI2D: 88.3%, DocVQA: 85.6%, TextVQA: 78.1%, ChartQA: 76.1%, RealWorldQA: 68.7%.

What are the context window sizes for Claude 3.5 Haiku and Grok-1.5V?

Claude 3.5 Haiku supports 200K tokens and Grok-1.5V supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Claude 3.5 Haiku and Grok-1.5V?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (5.8 vs -0.3), multimodal support (no vs yes). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Claude 3.5 Haiku and Grok-1.5V?

Claude 3.5 Haiku is developed by Anthropic and Grok-1.5V is developed by xAI.