Model Comparison

Grok-1.5V vs Claude 3.5 Haiku

Comparing Grok-1.5V and Claude 3.5 Haiku across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

No common benchmarks found

Grok-1.5V and Claude 3.5 Haiku don't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Cost data unavailable.

Lowest available price from all providers
Sat Apr 04 2026 • llm-stats.com
xAI
Grok-1.5V
Input tokens$0.00
Output tokens$0.00
Best providerUnknown Organization
Anthropic
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Input tokens$0.80
Output tokens$4.00
Best providerAWS Bedrock
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Claude 3.5 Haiku specifies input context (200,000 tokens). Only Claude 3.5 Haiku specifies output context (200,000 tokens).

xAI
Grok-1.5V
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Anthropic
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Input200,000 tokens
Output200,000 tokens
Sat Apr 04 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Grok-1.5V supports multimodal inputs, whereas Claude 3.5 Haiku does not.

Grok-1.5V can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Grok-1.5V

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Claude 3.5 Haiku

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Grok-1.5V

Proprietary

Closed source

Claude 3.5 Haiku

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Grok-1.5V was released on 2024-04-12, while Claude 3.5 Haiku was released on 2024-10-22.

Claude 3.5 Haiku is 6 months newer than Grok-1.5V.

Grok-1.5V

Apr 12, 2024

2.0 years ago

Claude 3.5 Haiku

Oct 22, 2024

1.4 years ago

6mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

xAI
Supports multimodal inputs
Anthropic
Larger context window (200,000 tokens)

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
xAI
Grok-1.5V
Anthropic
Claude 3.5 Haiku

FAQ

Common questions about Grok-1.5V vs Claude 3.5 Haiku

Grok-1.5V (xAI) and Claude 3.5 Haiku (Anthropic) each have strengths in different areas. Compare their benchmark scores, pricing, context windows, and capabilities above to determine which fits your needs.
Grok-1.5V scores AI2D: 88.3%, DocVQA: 85.6%, TextVQA: 78.1%, ChartQA: 76.1%, RealWorldQA: 68.7%. Claude 3.5 Haiku scores HumanEval: 88.1%, MGSM: 85.6%, DROP: 83.1%, MATH: 69.4%, MMLU-Pro: 65.0%.
Grok-1.5V supports an unknown number of tokens and Claude 3.5 Haiku supports 200K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.
Key differences include multimodal support (yes vs no). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.
Grok-1.5V is developed by xAI and Claude 3.5 Haiku is developed by Anthropic.