Model Comparison

Grok-1.5V vs Claude 3 HaikuWhich is better in 2026?

Comparing Grok-1.5V and Claude 3 Haiku across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

Verdict: Grok-1.5V vs Claude 3 Haiku — which is better?

Grok-1.5V (by xAI) and Claude 3 Haiku (by Anthropic) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.

Choose Grok-1.5V if…

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Apr 2024

Choose Claude 3 Haiku if…

  • you want predictable pricing at $0.25/M input and $1.25/M output
Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

No common benchmarks found

Grok-1.5V and Claude 3 Haiku don't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Claude 3 Haiku specifies input context (200,000 tokens). Only Claude 3 Haiku specifies output context (200,000 tokens).

xAI
Grok-1.5V
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Anthropic
Claude 3 Haiku
Input200,000 tokens
Output200,000 tokens
Tue Jun 09 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Both Grok-1.5V and Claude 3 Haiku support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Grok-1.5V

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Claude 3 Haiku

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Grok-1.5V

Proprietary

Closed source

Claude 3 Haiku

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Grok-1.5V was released on 2024-04-12, while Claude 3 Haiku was released on 2024-03-13.

Grok-1.5V is 1 month newer than Claude 3 Haiku.

Grok-1.5V

Apr 12, 2024

2.2 years ago

1mo newer
Claude 3 Haiku

Mar 13, 2024

2.2 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

xAI

No standout differentiators in the data we have for this pair.

Anthropic
Larger context window (200,000 tokens)

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
xAI
Grok-1.5V
Anthropic
Claude 3 Haiku

FAQ

Common questions about Grok-1.5V vs Claude 3 Haiku.

Which is better, Grok-1.5V or Claude 3 Haiku?

Grok-1.5V (xAI) and Claude 3 Haiku (Anthropic) each have strengths in different areas. Compare their benchmark scores, pricing, context windows, and capabilities above to determine which fits your needs.

How does Grok-1.5V compare to Claude 3 Haiku in benchmarks?

Grok-1.5V scores AI2D: 88.3%, DocVQA: 85.6%, TextVQA: 78.1%, ChartQA: 76.1%, RealWorldQA: 68.7%. Claude 3 Haiku scores ARC-C: 89.2%, GSM8k: 88.9%, HellaSwag: 85.9%, DROP: 78.4%, HumanEval: 75.9%.

What are the context window sizes for Grok-1.5V and Claude 3 Haiku?

Grok-1.5V supports an unknown number of tokens and Claude 3 Haiku supports 200K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

Who makes Grok-1.5V and Claude 3 Haiku?

Grok-1.5V is developed by xAI and Claude 3 Haiku is developed by Anthropic.

Related comparisons