Model Comparison

Grok-1.5V vs Phi-4-multimodal-instructWhich is better in 2026?

Phi-4-multimodal-instruct shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

Verdict: Grok-1.5V vs Phi-4-multimodal-instruct — which is better?

Grok-1.5V (by xAI) and Phi-4-multimodal-instruct (by Microsoft) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.

Grok-1.5V outperforms in 2 benchmarks (AI2D, TextVQA), while Phi-4-multimodal-instruct is better at 4 benchmarks (ChartQA, DocVQA, MathVista, MMMU). Phi-4-multimodal-instruct shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

Choose Grok-1.5V if…

  • you are already invested in the xAI ecosystem

Choose Phi-4-multimodal-instruct if…

  • you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 4 of 6 shared benchmarks
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Feb 2025
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

6 benchmarks

Grok-1.5V outperforms in 2 benchmarks (AI2D, TextVQA), while Phi-4-multimodal-instruct is better at 4 benchmarks (ChartQA, DocVQA, MathVista, MMMU).

Phi-4-multimodal-instruct shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

Tue Jul 21 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Phi-4-multimodal-instruct specifies input context (128,000 tokens). Only Phi-4-multimodal-instruct specifies output context (128,000 tokens).

xAI
Grok-1.5V
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Microsoft
Phi-4-multimodal-instruct
Input128,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Tue Jul 21 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Both Grok-1.5V and Phi-4-multimodal-instruct support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Grok-1.5V

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Phi-4-multimodal-instruct

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Grok-1.5V is licensed under a proprietary license, while Phi-4-multimodal-instruct uses MIT.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Grok-1.5V

Proprietary

Closed source

Phi-4-multimodal-instruct

MIT

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Grok-1.5V was released on 2024-04-12, while Phi-4-multimodal-instruct was released on 2025-02-01.

Phi-4-multimodal-instruct is 10 months newer than Grok-1.5V.

Grok-1.5V

Apr 12, 2024

2.3 years ago

Phi-4-multimodal-instruct

Feb 1, 2025

1.5 years ago

9mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Phi-4-multimodal-instruct has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-06-01, while Grok-1.5V's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Phi-4-multimodal-instruct's training data extends to 2024-06-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Grok-1.5V's cutoff date.

Grok-1.5V

—

Phi-4-multimodal-instruct

Jun 2024

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

xAI
Higher AI2D score (88.3% vs 82.3%)
Higher TextVQA score (78.1% vs 75.6%)
Microsoft
Larger context window (128,000 tokens)
Has open weights
Higher ChartQA score (81.4% vs 76.1%)
Higher DocVQA score (93.2% vs 85.6%)
Higher MathVista score (62.4% vs 52.8%)
Higher MMMU score (55.1% vs 53.6%)

Detailed Comparison

Interactive Arena

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Grok-1.5V and Phi-4-multimodal-instruct side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Grok-1.5V
✓ Preferred
Phi-4-multimodal-instruct
Open in Playground
AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
xAI
Grok-1.5V
Microsoft
Phi-4-multimodal-instruct

FAQ

Common questions about Grok-1.5V vs Phi-4-multimodal-instruct.

Which is better, Grok-1.5V or Phi-4-multimodal-instruct?

Phi-4-multimodal-instruct shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks. Grok-1.5V is made by xAI and Phi-4-multimodal-instruct is made by Microsoft. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Grok-1.5V compare to Phi-4-multimodal-instruct in benchmarks?

Grok-1.5V scores AI2D: 88.3%, DocVQA: 85.6%, TextVQA: 78.1%, ChartQA: 76.1%, RealWorldQA: 68.7%. Phi-4-multimodal-instruct scores ScienceQA Visual: 97.5%, DocVQA: 93.2%, MMBench: 86.7%, POPE: 85.6%, OCRBench: 84.4%.

What are the context window sizes for Grok-1.5V and Phi-4-multimodal-instruct?

Grok-1.5V supports an unknown number of tokens and Phi-4-multimodal-instruct supports 128K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Grok-1.5V and Phi-4-multimodal-instruct?

Key differences include licensing (Proprietary vs MIT). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Grok-1.5V and Phi-4-multimodal-instruct?

Grok-1.5V is developed by xAI and Phi-4-multimodal-instruct is developed by Microsoft.

Related comparisons