The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Grok-1.5V vs Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking leads the LLM Stats Score 26.7 to -0.8.

xAI · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking leads the overall LLM Stats Score 26.7 to -0.8, ranking #151 overall.

In the 2 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking wins 2; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Grok-1.5V

  • you are already invested in the xAI ecosystem

Choose Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking

  • overall performance matters — it scores 26.7 and ranks #151 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 2 of 2 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2025
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
-0.8
#335
26.7
#151
-0.1
#322
26.9
#145
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
0 of 2
2 of 2
Input price
— / M
$0.45 / M
Output price
— / M
$3.49 / M
Context window
262,144

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

2 shared
Index
Grok-1.5V
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking
-1.7#189
18.0#81
0.7#153
20.1#70
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

7 reported for Grok-1.5V · 67 for Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking

2 shared

Grok-1.5V outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking is better at 2 benchmarks (AI2D, RealWorldQA).

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Tue Sep 22 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking specifies input context (262,144 tokens). Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking specifies output context (262,144 tokens).

xAI
Grok-1.5V
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking
Input262,144 tokens
Output262,144 tokens
Tue Sep 22 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both Grok-1.5V and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Grok-1.5V

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Grok-1.5V is licensed under a proprietary license, while Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Grok-1.5V

Proprietary

Closed source

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Grok-1.5V was released on 2024-04-12, while Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking was released on 2025-09-22.

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking is 18 months newer than Grok-1.5V.

Grok-1.5V

Apr 12, 2024

2.4 years ago

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking

Sep 22, 2025

1.0 years ago

1.4yr newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Grok-1.5V and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Grok-1.5V
✓ Preferred
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Grok-1.5V vs Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking.

Which is better, Grok-1.5V or Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking?

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking leads the LLM Stats Score 26.7 to -0.8. Grok-1.5V is made by xAI and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Grok-1.5V compare to Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking in benchmarks?

Grok-1.5V scores AI2D: 88.3%, DocVQA: 85.6%, TextVQA: 78.1%, ChartQA: 76.1%, RealWorldQA: 68.7%. Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking scores ZebraLogic: 97.3%, DocVQAtest: 96.5%, ScreenSpot: 95.4%, CountBench: 93.7%, MMLU-Redux: 93.7%.

What are the context window sizes for Grok-1.5V and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking?

Grok-1.5V supports an unknown number of tokens and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking supports 262K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Grok-1.5V and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (-0.8 vs 26.7), licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Grok-1.5V and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking?

Grok-1.5V is developed by xAI and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.