The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Grok-2 mini vs Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct

Grok-2 mini leads the LLM Stats Score 8.7 to 2.1.

xAI · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Grok-2 mini leads the overall LLM Stats Score 8.7 to 2.1, ranking #275 overall.

In the 4 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Grok-2 mini wins 3; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Grok-2 mini

  • overall performance matters — it scores 8.7 and ranks #275 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 3 of 4 exact shared results

Choose Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2024
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
8.7
#275
2.1
#315
8.3
#272
2.1
#305
5.9
#192
10.0
#164
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
3 of 4
1 of 4
Input price
— / M
$0.09 / M
Output price
— / M
$0.09 / M
Context window
128,000

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

3 shared
Index
Grok-2 mini
Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct
15.8#210
4.9#276
15.7#119
1.2#190
15.7#101
-0.4#185
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

8 reported for Grok-2 mini · 15 for Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct

4 shared

Grok-2 mini outperforms in 3 benchmarks (MATH, MMLU, MMLU-Pro), while Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct is better at 1 benchmark (HumanEval).

Grok-2 mini shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

Thu Sep 10 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct specifies input context (128,000 tokens). Only Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct specifies output context (128,000 tokens).

xAI
Grok-2 mini
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct
Input128,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Thu Sep 10 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Grok-2 mini supports multimodal inputs, whereas Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct does not.

Grok-2 mini can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Grok-2 mini

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Grok-2 mini is licensed under a proprietary license, while Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Grok-2 mini

Proprietary

Closed source

Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Grok-2 mini was released on 2024-08-13, while Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct was released on 2024-09-19.

Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct is 1 month newer than Grok-2 mini.

Grok-2 mini

Aug 13, 2024

2.1 years ago

Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct

Sep 19, 2024

2.0 years ago

1mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Grok-2 mini and Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Grok-2 mini
✓ Preferred
Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Grok-2 mini vs Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct.

Which is better, Grok-2 mini or Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct?

Grok-2 mini leads the LLM Stats Score 8.7 to 2.1. Grok-2 mini is made by xAI and Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Grok-2 mini compare to Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct in benchmarks?

Grok-2 mini scores DocVQA: 93.2%, MMLU: 86.2%, HumanEval: 85.7%, MATH: 73.0%, MMLU-Pro: 72.0%. Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct scores HumanEval: 92.7%, GSM8k: 91.1%, MBPP: 90.2%, HellaSwag: 83.0%, Winogrande: 80.8%.

What are the context window sizes for Grok-2 mini and Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct?

Grok-2 mini supports an unknown number of tokens and Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct supports 128K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Grok-2 mini and Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (8.7 vs 2.1), multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Grok-2 mini and Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct?

Grok-2 mini is developed by xAI and Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.