Model Comparison
Grok-3 Mini vs MiMo-V2-FlashWhich is better in 2026?
Both models are evenly matched across the benchmarks. MiMo-V2-Flash is 2.3x cheaper per token.
Verdict: Grok-3 Mini vs MiMo-V2-Flash — which is better?
Grok-3 Mini (by xAI) and MiMo-V2-Flash (by Xiaomi) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.
Grok-3 Mini outperforms in 1 benchmarks (GPQA), while MiMo-V2-Flash is better at 1 benchmark (AIME 2025). Both models are evenly matched across the benchmarks.
On price, MiMo-V2-Flash is roughly 2.3x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.
MiMo-V2-Flash also accepts a larger context window (256,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.
Choose Grok-3 Mini if…
- you want predictable pricing at $0.30/M input and $0.50/M output
Choose MiMo-V2-Flash if…
- cost matters — it's about 2.3x cheaper per token
- you process long inputs — it offers a 256,000 token context window
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped Dec 2025
- you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune
Performance Benchmarks
Comparative analysis across standard metrics
Grok-3 Mini outperforms in 1 benchmarks (GPQA), while MiMo-V2-Flash is better at 1 benchmark (AIME 2025).
Both models are evenly matched across the benchmarks.
Arena Performance
Human preference votes
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
For input processing, Grok-3 Mini ($0.30/1M tokens) is 3.0x more expensive than MiMo-V2-Flash ($0.10/1M tokens).
For output processing, Grok-3 Mini ($0.50/1M tokens) is 1.7x more expensive than MiMo-V2-Flash ($0.30/1M tokens).
In conclusion, Grok-3 Mini is more expensive than MiMo-V2-Flash.*
* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
MiMo-V2-Flash accepts 256,000 input tokens compared to Grok-3 Mini's 128,000 tokens. MiMo-V2-Flash can generate longer responses up to 16,384 tokens, while Grok-3 Mini is limited to 8,000 tokens.
Input Capabilities
Supported data types and modalities
Grok-3 Mini supports multimodal inputs, whereas MiMo-V2-Flash does not.
Grok-3 Mini can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.
Grok-3 Mini
MiMo-V2-Flash
License
Usage and distribution terms
Grok-3 Mini is licensed under a proprietary license, while MiMo-V2-Flash uses MIT.
License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.
Proprietary
Closed source
MIT
Open weights
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
Grok-3 Mini was released on 2025-02-17, while MiMo-V2-Flash was released on 2025-12-16.
MiMo-V2-Flash is 10 months newer than Grok-3 Mini.
Feb 17, 2025
1.5 years ago
Dec 16, 2025
7 months ago
10mo newerKnowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Grok-3 Mini has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-11-17, while MiMo-V2-Flash's cutoff date is not specified.
We can confirm Grok-3 Mini's training data extends to 2024-11-17, but cannot make a direct comparison without MiMo-V2-Flash's cutoff date.
Nov 2024
—
Provider Availability
Grok-3 Mini is available from xAI. MiMo-V2-Flash is available from Xiaomi.
Grok-3 Mini
MiMo-V2-Flash
Outputs Comparison
Key Takeaways
Detailed Comparison
Interactive Arena
Judge for yourself.
Run your own prompts against Grok-3 Mini and MiMo-V2-Flash side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.
| Feature |
|---|
FAQ
Common questions about Grok-3 Mini vs MiMo-V2-Flash.