The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Grok-3 Mini vs Muse Ember

Muse Ember leads the LLM Stats Score 45.9 to 30.6. Muse Ember is 1.7x cheaper per token.

xAI · Meta · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Muse Ember leads the overall LLM Stats Score 45.9 to 30.6, ranking #47 overall.

On price, Muse Ember is roughly 1.7x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Muse Ember also accepts a larger context window (1,048,576 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Grok-3 Mini

  • you want predictable pricing at $0.30/M input and $0.50/M output

Choose Muse Ember

  • overall performance matters — it scores 45.9 and ranks #47 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • cost matters — it's about 1.7x cheaper per token
  • you process long inputs — it offers a 1,048,576 token context window
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Nov 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
30.6
#150
45.9
#47
30.3
#148
48.1
#24
18.6
#143
27.3
#86
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
$0.30 / M
$0.10 / M
Output price
$0.50 / M
$0.50 / M
Context window
128,000
1,048,576

Individual benchmarks

4 reported for Grok-3 Mini · 6 for Muse Ember

No common benchmarks found

Grok-3 Mini and Muse Emberdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Muse Ember costs less

For input processing, Grok-3 Mini ($0.30/1M tokens) is 3.0x more expensive than Muse Ember ($0.10/1M tokens).

For output processing, Grok-3 Mini ($0.50/1M tokens) costs the same as Muse Ember ($0.50/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Grok-3 Mini is more expensive than Muse Ember.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Fri Nov 13 2026 • llm-stats.com
xAI
Grok-3 Mini
Input tokens$0.30
Output tokens$0.50
Best providerxAI
Meta
Muse Ember
Input tokens$0.10
Output tokens$0.50
Best providerMeta
Notice missing or incorrect data?

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Muse Ember accepts 1,048,576 input tokens compared to Grok-3 Mini's 128,000 tokens. Muse Ember can generate longer responses up to 524,288 tokens, while Grok-3 Mini is limited to 8,000 tokens.

xAI
Grok-3 Mini
Input128,000 tokens
Output8,000 tokens
Meta
Muse Ember
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output524,288 tokens
Fri Nov 13 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both Grok-3 Mini and Muse Ember support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Grok-3 Mini

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Muse Ember

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Grok-3 Mini

Proprietary

Closed source

Muse Ember

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Grok-3 Mini was released on 2025-02-17, while Muse Ember was released on 2026-11-09.

Muse Ember is 21 months newer than Grok-3 Mini.

Grok-3 Mini

Feb 17, 2025

1.7 years ago

Muse Ember

Nov 9, 2026

3 days ago

1.7yr newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Grok-3 Mini has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-11-17, while Muse Ember's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Grok-3 Mini's training data extends to 2024-11-17, but cannot make a direct comparison without Muse Ember's cutoff date.

Grok-3 Mini

Nov 2024

Muse Ember

—

Provider Availability

Grok-3 Mini is available from xAI. Muse Ember is available from Meta Model API.

Grok-3 Mini

xai logo
xAI
Input Price:Input: $0.30/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.50/1M

Muse Ember

meta logo
Meta
Input Price:Input: $0.10/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.50/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Grok-3 Mini and Muse Ember side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Grok-3 Mini
✓ Preferred
Muse Ember
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Grok-3 Mini vs Muse Ember.

Which is better, Grok-3 Mini or Muse Ember?

Muse Ember leads the LLM Stats Score 45.9 to 30.6. Grok-3 Mini is made by xAI and Muse Ember is made by Meta. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Grok-3 Mini compare to Muse Ember in benchmarks?

Grok-3 Mini scores AIME 2024: 95.8%, AIME 2025: 90.8%, GPQA: 84.0%, LiveCodeBench: 80.4%. Muse Ember scores PerceptionBench: 80.6%, OSWorld 2.1 (partial): 69.5%, Agents' Last Exam: 61.6%, Personal Superintelligence Index: 46.8%, Terminal-Bench 4.0: 40.9%.

Is Grok-3 Mini cheaper than Muse Ember?

Muse Ember is 3.0x cheaper for input tokens. Grok-3 Mini costs $0.30/M input and $0.50/M output via xai. Muse Ember costs $0.10/M input and $0.50/M output via meta.

What are the context window sizes for Grok-3 Mini and Muse Ember?

Grok-3 Mini supports 128K tokens and Muse Ember supports 1.0M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Grok-3 Mini and Muse Ember?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (30.6 vs 45.9), context window (128K vs 1.0M), input pricing ($0.30 vs $0.10/M). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Grok-3 Mini and Muse Ember?

Grok-3 Mini is developed by xAI and Muse Ember is developed by Meta.