Model Comparison
Grok-3 vs Gemma 3n E4B InstructedWhich is better in 2026?
Grok-3 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Grok-3 is 4.2x cheaper per token.
Verdict: Grok-3 vs Gemma 3n E4B Instructed — which is better?
Grok-3 (by xAI) and Gemma 3n E4B Instructed (by Google) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.
Grok-3 outperforms in 3 benchmarks (AIME 2025, GPQA, LiveCodeBench), while Gemma 3n E4B Instructed is better at 0 benchmarks. Grok-3 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.
On price, Grok-3 is roughly 4.2x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.
Grok-3 also accepts a larger context window (128,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.
Choose Grok-3 if…
- you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 3 of 3 shared benchmarks
- cost matters — it's about 4.2x cheaper per token
- you process long inputs — it offers a 128,000 token context window
Choose Gemma 3n E4B Instructed if…
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped Jun 2025
Performance Benchmarks
Comparative analysis across standard metrics
Grok-3 outperforms in 3 benchmarks (AIME 2025, GPQA, LiveCodeBench), while Gemma 3n E4B Instructed is better at 0 benchmarks.
Grok-3 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.
Arena Performance
Human preference votes
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
For input processing, Grok-3 ($3.00/1M tokens) is 6.7x cheaper than Gemma 3n E4B Instructed ($20.00/1M tokens).
For output processing, Grok-3 ($15.00/1M tokens) is 2.7x cheaper than Gemma 3n E4B Instructed ($40.00/1M tokens).
In conclusion, Gemma 3n E4B Instructed is more expensive than Grok-3.*
* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
Grok-3 accepts 128,000 input tokens compared to Gemma 3n E4B Instructed's 32,000 tokens. Gemma 3n E4B Instructed can generate longer responses up to 32,000 tokens, while Grok-3 is limited to 8,000 tokens.
Input Capabilities
Supported data types and modalities
Both Grok-3 and Gemma 3n E4B Instructed support multimodal inputs.
They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.
Grok-3
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
License
Usage and distribution terms
Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.
Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.
Proprietary
Closed source
Proprietary
Closed source
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
Grok-3 was released on 2025-02-17, while Gemma 3n E4B Instructed was released on 2025-06-26.
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed is 4 months newer than Grok-3.
Feb 17, 2025
1.4 years ago
Jun 26, 2025
1.0 years ago
4mo newerKnowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Grok-3 has a knowledge cutoff of 2024-11-17, while Gemma 3n E4B Instructed has a cutoff of 2024-06-01.
Grok-3 has more recent training data (up to 2024-11-17), making it potentially better informed about events through that date compared to Gemma 3n E4B Instructed (2024-06-01).
Nov 2024
5 mo newerJun 2024
Provider Availability
Grok-3 is available from xAI. Gemma 3n E4B Instructed is available from Together.
Grok-3
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
Outputs Comparison
Key Takeaways
No standout differentiators in the data we have for this pair.
Grok-3Gemma 3n E4B InstructedDetailed Comparison
Interactive Arena
Judge for yourself.
Run your own prompts against Grok-3 and Gemma 3n E4B Instructed side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.
| Feature | | |
|---|
FAQ
Common questions about Grok-3 vs Gemma 3n E4B Instructed.