Grok-3 vs Muse Ember
Muse Ember leads the LLM Stats Score 45.9 to 29.7. Muse Ember is 30.0x cheaper per token.
xAI · Meta · Updated for 2026
Which is better?
Muse Ember leads the overall LLM Stats Score 45.9 to 29.7, ranking #47 overall.
On price, Muse Ember is roughly 30.0x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.
Muse Ember also accepts a larger context window (1,048,576 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.
Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.
Choose Grok-3
- you want predictable pricing at $3.00/M input and $15.00/M output
Choose Muse Ember
- overall performance matters — it scores 45.9 and ranks #47 on LLM Stats
- your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
- cost matters — it's about 30.0x cheaper per token
- you process long inputs — it offers a 1,048,576 token context window
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped Nov 2026
At a glance
The differences that matter most.
Individual benchmarks
5 reported for Grok-3 · 6 for Muse Ember
Grok-3 and Muse Emberdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.
Human preference
Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
For input processing, Grok-3 ($3.00/1M tokens) is 30.0x more expensive than Muse Ember ($0.10/1M tokens).
For output processing, Grok-3 ($15.00/1M tokens) is 30.0x more expensive than Muse Ember ($0.50/1M tokens).
In conclusion, Grok-3 is more expensive than Muse Ember.*
* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
Muse Ember accepts 1,048,576 input tokens compared to Grok-3's 128,000 tokens. Muse Ember can generate longer responses up to 524,288 tokens, while Grok-3 is limited to 8,000 tokens.
Input capabilities
Documented input modalities across available providers
Both Grok-3 and Muse Ember support multimodal inputs.
They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.
Grok-3
Muse Ember
License
Usage and distribution terms
Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.
Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.
Proprietary
Closed source
Proprietary
Closed source
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
Grok-3 was released on 2025-02-17, while Muse Ember was released on 2026-11-09.
Muse Ember is 21 months newer than Grok-3.
Feb 17, 2025
1.7 years ago
Nov 9, 2026
3 days ago
1.7yr newerKnowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Grok-3 has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-11-17, while Muse Ember's cutoff date is not specified.
We can confirm Grok-3's training data extends to 2024-11-17, but cannot make a direct comparison without Muse Ember's cutoff date.
Nov 2024
—
Provider Availability
Grok-3 is available from xAI. Muse Ember is available from Meta Model API.
Grok-3
Muse Ember
Outputs Comparison
Judge for yourself.
Run your own prompts against Grok-3 and Muse Ember side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.
FAQ
Common questions about Grok-3 vs Muse Ember.