The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Grok 4 Fast vs Grok-4 Heavy

Grok-4 Heavy leads the LLM Stats Score 40.9 to 32.0.

xAI · xAI · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Grok-4 Heavy leads the overall LLM Stats Score 40.9 to 32.0, ranking #50 overall.

In the 4 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Grok-4 Heavy wins 3; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Grok 4 Fast

  • you want predictable pricing at $0.20/M input and $0.50/M output

Choose Grok-4 Heavy

  • overall performance matters — it scores 40.9 and ranks #50 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 3 of 4 exact shared results

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
32.0
#101
40.9
#50
31.1
#103
39.2
#53
18.3
#106
17.9
#108
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
1 of 4
3 of 4
Input price
$0.20 / M
— / M
Output price
$0.50 / M
— / M
Context window
2,000,000

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
Grok 4 Fast
Grok-4 Heavy
27.4#94
41.4#6
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

7 reported for Grok 4 Fast · 6 for Grok-4 Heavy

4 shared

Grok 4 Fast outperforms in 1 benchmarks (LiveCodeBench), while Grok-4 Heavy is better at 3 benchmarks (AIME 2025, GPQA, Humanity's Last Exam).

Grok-4 Heavy shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

Fri Sep 04 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Grok 4 Fast specifies input context (2,000,000 tokens). Only Grok 4 Fast specifies output context (30,000 tokens).

xAI
Grok 4 Fast
Input2,000,000 tokens
Output30,000 tokens
xAI
Grok-4 Heavy
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Fri Sep 04 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both Grok 4 Fast and Grok-4 Heavy support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Grok 4 Fast

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Grok-4 Heavy

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Grok 4 Fast

Proprietary

Closed source

Grok-4 Heavy

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Grok 4 Fast was released on 2025-08-28, while Grok-4 Heavy's release date is not specified.

We can confirm Grok 4 Fast's release timeline, but cannot make a direct age comparison without Grok-4 Heavy's release date.

Grok 4 Fast

Aug 28, 2025

1.0 years ago

Grok-4 Heavy

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Grok-4 Heavy has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-12-31, while Grok 4 Fast's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Grok-4 Heavy's training data extends to 2024-12-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without Grok 4 Fast's cutoff date.

Grok 4 Fast

Grok-4 Heavy

Dec 2024

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Grok 4 Fast and Grok-4 Heavy side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Grok 4 Fast
✓ Preferred
Grok-4 Heavy
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Grok 4 Fast vs Grok-4 Heavy.

Which is better, Grok 4 Fast or Grok-4 Heavy?

Grok-4 Heavy leads the LLM Stats Score 40.9 to 32.0. Grok 4 Fast is made by xAI and Grok-4 Heavy is made by xAI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Grok 4 Fast compare to Grok-4 Heavy in benchmarks?

Grok 4 Fast scores SimpleQA: 95.0%, HMMT 2025: 93.3%, AIME 2025: 92.0%, GPQA: 85.7%, LiveCodeBench: 80.0%. Grok-4 Heavy scores AIME 2025: 100.0%, HMMT25: 96.7%, GPQA: 88.4%, LiveCodeBench: 79.4%, USAMO25: 61.9%.

What are the context window sizes for Grok 4 Fast and Grok-4 Heavy?

Grok 4 Fast supports 2.0M tokens and Grok-4 Heavy supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Grok 4 Fast and Grok-4 Heavy?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (32.0 vs 40.9). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.