The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Grok-4 Heavy vs Muse Spark Open

Grok-4 Heavy and Muse Spark Open are closely matched at 40.7 and 44.9 on the LLM Stats Score.

xAI · Meta · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Grok-4 Heavy and Muse Spark Open are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at 40.7 and 44.9.

In the 1 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Muse Spark Open wins 1; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Grok-4 Heavy

  • you are already invested in the xAI ecosystem

Choose Muse Spark Open

  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 1 of 1 exact shared results
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
40.7
#71
44.9
#43
39.0
#73
45.2
#39
17.6
#134
33.0
#42
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
0 of 1
1 of 1
Input price
— / M
$1.25 / M
Output price
— / M
$4.25 / M
Context window
—
1,048,576

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
Grok-4 Heavy
Muse Spark Open
41.7#8
31.6#69
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

6 reported for Grok-4 Heavy · 17 for Muse Spark Open

1 shared

Grok-4 Heavy outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Muse Spark Open is better at 1 benchmark (GPQA).

Muse Spark Open significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Mon Oct 19 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Muse Spark Open specifies input context (1,048,576 tokens). Only Muse Spark Open specifies output context (1,048,576 tokens).

xAI
Grok-4 Heavy
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Meta
Muse Spark Open
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output1,048,576 tokens
Mon Oct 19 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both Grok-4 Heavy and Muse Spark Open support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Grok-4 Heavy

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Muse Spark Open

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Grok-4 Heavy is licensed under a proprietary license, while Muse Spark Open uses Muse Model License.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Grok-4 Heavy

Proprietary

Closed source

Muse Spark Open

Muse Model License

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Muse Spark Open was released on 2026-10-15, while Grok-4 Heavy's release date is not specified.

We can confirm Muse Spark Open's release timeline, but cannot make a direct age comparison without Grok-4 Heavy's release date.

Grok-4 Heavy

—

Muse Spark Open

Oct 15, 2026

4 days ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Grok-4 Heavy has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-12-31, while Muse Spark Open's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Grok-4 Heavy's training data extends to 2024-12-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without Muse Spark Open's cutoff date.

Grok-4 Heavy

Dec 2024

Muse Spark Open

—

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Grok-4 Heavy and Muse Spark Open side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Grok-4 Heavy
✓ Preferred
Muse Spark Open
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Grok-4 Heavy vs Muse Spark Open.

Which is better, Grok-4 Heavy or Muse Spark Open?

Grok-4 Heavy and Muse Spark Open are closely matched on the LLM Stats Score at 40.7 and 44.9. Grok-4 Heavy is made by xAI and Muse Spark Open is made by Meta. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Grok-4 Heavy compare to Muse Spark Open in benchmarks?

Grok-4 Heavy scores AIME 2025: 100.0%, HMMT25: 96.7%, GPQA: 88.4%, LiveCodeBench: 79.4%, USAMO25: 61.9%. Muse Spark Open scores MCP Atlas: 89.2%, GPQA: 89.0%, OSWorld-Verified: 80.4%, BabyVision: 80.2%, Terminal-Bench 2.1: 76.4%.

What are the context window sizes for Grok-4 Heavy and Muse Spark Open?

Grok-4 Heavy supports an unknown number of tokens and Muse Spark Open supports 1.0M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Grok-4 Heavy and Muse Spark Open?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (40.7 vs 44.9), licensing (Proprietary vs Muse Model License). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Grok-4 Heavy and Muse Spark Open?

Grok-4 Heavy is developed by xAI and Muse Spark Open is developed by Meta.