The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Grok-4 Heavy vs Llama 4 Maverick

Grok-4 Heavy leads the LLM Stats Score 40.9 to 14.8.

xAI · Meta · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Grok-4 Heavy leads the overall LLM Stats Score 40.9 to 14.8, ranking #50 overall.

In the 2 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Grok-4 Heavy wins 2; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Grok-4 Heavy

  • overall performance matters — it scores 40.9 and ranks #50 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 2 of 2 exact shared results

Choose Llama 4 Maverick

  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
40.9
#50
14.8
#221
39.2
#53
14.5
#218
17.9
#108
3.2
#211
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
2 of 2
0 of 2
Input price
— / M
$0.17 / M
Output price
— / M
$0.60 / M
Context window
1,000,000

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
Grok-4 Heavy
Llama 4 Maverick
41.4#6
20.6#149
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

6 reported for Grok-4 Heavy · 13 for Llama 4 Maverick

2 shared

Grok-4 Heavy outperforms in 2 benchmarks (GPQA, LiveCodeBench), while Llama 4 Maverick is better at 0 benchmarks.

Grok-4 Heavy significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Sun Sep 06 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Llama 4 Maverick specifies input context (1,000,000 tokens). Only Llama 4 Maverick specifies output context (1,000,000 tokens).

xAI
Grok-4 Heavy
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Meta
Llama 4 Maverick
Input1,000,000 tokens
Output1,000,000 tokens
Sun Sep 06 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both Grok-4 Heavy and Llama 4 Maverick support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Grok-4 Heavy

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Llama 4 Maverick

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Grok-4 Heavy is licensed under a proprietary license, while Llama 4 Maverick uses Llama 4 Community License Agreement.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Grok-4 Heavy

Proprietary

Closed source

Llama 4 Maverick

Llama 4 Community License Agreement

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Llama 4 Maverick was released on 2025-04-05, while Grok-4 Heavy's release date is not specified.

We can confirm Llama 4 Maverick's release timeline, but cannot make a direct age comparison without Grok-4 Heavy's release date.

Grok-4 Heavy

Llama 4 Maverick

Apr 5, 2025

1.4 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Grok-4 Heavy has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-12-31, while Llama 4 Maverick's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Grok-4 Heavy's training data extends to 2024-12-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without Llama 4 Maverick's cutoff date.

Grok-4 Heavy

Dec 2024

Llama 4 Maverick

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Grok-4 Heavy and Llama 4 Maverick side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Grok-4 Heavy
✓ Preferred
Llama 4 Maverick
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Grok-4 Heavy vs Llama 4 Maverick.

Which is better, Grok-4 Heavy or Llama 4 Maverick?

Grok-4 Heavy leads the LLM Stats Score 40.9 to 14.8. Grok-4 Heavy is made by xAI and Llama 4 Maverick is made by Meta. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Grok-4 Heavy compare to Llama 4 Maverick in benchmarks?

Grok-4 Heavy scores AIME 2025: 100.0%, HMMT25: 96.7%, GPQA: 88.4%, LiveCodeBench: 79.4%, USAMO25: 61.9%. Llama 4 Maverick scores DocVQA: 94.4%, MGSM: 92.3%, ChartQA: 90.0%, MMLU: 85.5%, MMLU-Pro: 80.5%.

What are the context window sizes for Grok-4 Heavy and Llama 4 Maverick?

Grok-4 Heavy supports an unknown number of tokens and Llama 4 Maverick supports 1.0M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Grok-4 Heavy and Llama 4 Maverick?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (40.9 vs 14.8), licensing (Proprietary vs Llama 4 Community License Agreement). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Grok-4 Heavy and Llama 4 Maverick?

Grok-4 Heavy is developed by xAI and Llama 4 Maverick is developed by Meta.