Llama 4 Maverick vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro
MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads the LLM Stats Score 49.8 to 14.7. Llama 4 Maverick is 2.0x cheaper per token.
Meta · Xiaomi · Updated for 2026
Which is better?
MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads the overall LLM Stats Score 49.8 to 14.7, ranking #19 overall.
On price, Llama 4 Maverick is roughly 2.0x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.
MiMo-V2.6-Pro also accepts a larger context window (1,048,576 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.
Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.
Choose Llama 4 Maverick
- cost matters — it's about 2.0x cheaper per token
Choose MiMo-V2.6-Pro
- overall performance matters — it scores 49.8 and ranks #19 on LLM Stats
- your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
- you process long inputs — it offers a 1,048,576 token context window
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026
At a glance
The differences that matter most.
Individual benchmarks
13 reported for Llama 4 Maverick · 18 for MiMo-V2.6-Pro
Llama 4 Maverick and MiMo-V2.6-Prodon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.
Human preference
Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
For input processing, Llama 4 Maverick ($0.17/1M tokens) is 2.6x cheaper than MiMo-V2.6-Pro ($0.43/1M tokens).
For output processing, Llama 4 Maverick ($0.60/1M tokens) is 1.4x cheaper than MiMo-V2.6-Pro ($0.87/1M tokens).
In conclusion, MiMo-V2.6-Pro is more expensive than Llama 4 Maverick.*
* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens
Model Size
Parameter count comparison
MiMo-V2.6-Pro has 620.0B more parameters than Llama 4 Maverick, making it 155.0% larger.
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
MiMo-V2.6-Pro accepts 1,048,576 input tokens compared to Llama 4 Maverick's 1,000,000 tokens. Only Llama 4 Maverick specifies output context (1,000,000 tokens).
Input capabilities
Documented input modalities across available providers
Both Llama 4 Maverick and MiMo-V2.6-Pro support multimodal inputs.
They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.
Llama 4 Maverick
MiMo-V2.6-Pro
License
Usage and distribution terms
Llama 4 Maverick is licensed under Llama 4 Community License Agreement, while MiMo-V2.6-Pro uses MIT.
License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.
Llama 4 Community License Agreement
Open weights
MIT
Open weights
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
Llama 4 Maverick was released on 2025-04-05, while MiMo-V2.6-Pro was released on 2026-09-22.
MiMo-V2.6-Pro is 18 months newer than Llama 4 Maverick.
Apr 5, 2025
1.5 years ago
Sep 22, 2026
-1 days ago
1.5yr newerKnowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.
Unable to compare the recency of their training data.
Provider Availability
Llama 4 Maverick is available from DeepInfra, Novita, Lambda, Groq, Fireworks, Together, Sambanova. MiMo-V2.6-Pro is available from Xiaomi.
Llama 4 Maverick
MiMo-V2.6-Pro
Outputs Comparison
Judge for yourself.
Run your own prompts against Llama 4 Maverick and MiMo-V2.6-Pro side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.
FAQ
Common questions about Llama 4 Maverick vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro.