The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Grok-4 Heavy vs Nemotron Nano 9B v2

Grok-4 Heavy leads the LLM Stats Score 40.7 to 18.5.

xAI · NVIDIA · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Grok-4 Heavy leads the overall LLM Stats Score 40.7 to 18.5, ranking #53 overall.

In the 3 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Grok-4 Heavy wins 3; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Grok-4 Heavy

  • overall performance matters — it scores 40.7 and ranks #53 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 3 of 3 exact shared results

Choose Nemotron Nano 9B v2

  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
40.7
#53
18.5
#210
39.0
#56
17.3
#208
17.7
#113
14.4
#131
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
3 of 3
0 of 3
Input price
— / M
— / M
Output price
— / M
— / M
Context window

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
Grok-4 Heavy
Nemotron Nano 9B v2
41.4#6
16.4#204
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

6 reported for Grok-4 Heavy · 6 for Nemotron Nano 9B v2

3 shared

Grok-4 Heavy outperforms in 3 benchmarks (AIME 2025, GPQA, LiveCodeBench), while Nemotron Nano 9B v2 is better at 0 benchmarks.

Grok-4 Heavy significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Thu Sep 10 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Grok-4 Heavy supports multimodal inputs, whereas Nemotron Nano 9B v2 does not.

Grok-4 Heavy can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Grok-4 Heavy

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Nemotron Nano 9B v2

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Grok-4 Heavy is licensed under a proprietary license, while Nemotron Nano 9B v2 uses NVIDIA Open Model License Agreement .

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Grok-4 Heavy

Proprietary

Closed source

Nemotron Nano 9B v2

NVIDIA Open Model License Agreement

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Nemotron Nano 9B v2 was released on 2025-08-18, while Grok-4 Heavy's release date is not specified.

We can confirm Nemotron Nano 9B v2's release timeline, but cannot make a direct age comparison without Grok-4 Heavy's release date.

Grok-4 Heavy

Nemotron Nano 9B v2

Aug 18, 2025

1.1 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Grok-4 Heavy has a knowledge cutoff of 2024-12-31, while Nemotron Nano 9B v2 has a cutoff of 2024-09-01.

Grok-4 Heavy has more recent training data (up to 2024-12-31), making it potentially better informed about events through that date compared to Nemotron Nano 9B v2 (2024-09-01).

Grok-4 Heavy

Dec 2024

3 mo newer
Nemotron Nano 9B v2

Sep 2024

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Grok-4 Heavy and Nemotron Nano 9B v2 side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Grok-4 Heavy
✓ Preferred
Nemotron Nano 9B v2
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Grok-4 Heavy vs Nemotron Nano 9B v2.

Which is better, Grok-4 Heavy or Nemotron Nano 9B v2?

Grok-4 Heavy leads the LLM Stats Score 40.7 to 18.5. Grok-4 Heavy is made by xAI and Nemotron Nano 9B v2 is made by NVIDIA. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Grok-4 Heavy compare to Nemotron Nano 9B v2 in benchmarks?

Grok-4 Heavy scores AIME 2025: 100.0%, HMMT25: 96.7%, GPQA: 88.4%, LiveCodeBench: 79.4%, USAMO25: 61.9%. Nemotron Nano 9B v2 scores MATH-500: 97.8%, IFEval: 90.3%, AIME 2025: 72.1%, LiveCodeBench: 71.1%, BFCL_v3_MultiTurn: 66.9%.

What are the main differences between Grok-4 Heavy and Nemotron Nano 9B v2?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (40.7 vs 18.5), multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Proprietary vs NVIDIA Open Model License Agreement ). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Grok-4 Heavy and Nemotron Nano 9B v2?

Grok-4 Heavy is developed by xAI and Nemotron Nano 9B v2 is developed by NVIDIA.