The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Grok 4.6 vs LFM3-VL-2B

Grok 4.6 leads the LLM Stats Score 44.3 to 15.5.

xAI · Liquid AI · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Grok 4.6 leads the overall LLM Stats Score 44.3 to 15.5, ranking #50 overall.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Grok 4.6

  • overall performance matters — it scores 44.3 and ranks #50 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes

Choose LFM3-VL-2B

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2026
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
44.3
#50
15.5
#265
46.0
#33
16.2
#252
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
$2.00 / M
— / M
Output price
$6.00 / M
— / M
Context window
500,000
—

Individual benchmarks

12 reported for Grok 4.6 · 41 for LFM3-VL-2B

No common benchmarks found

Grok 4.6 and LFM3-VL-2Bdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Grok 4.6 specifies input context (500,000 tokens).

xAI
Grok 4.6
Input500,000 tokens
Output- tokens
Liquid AI
LFM3-VL-2B
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Sat Nov 07 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both Grok 4.6 and LFM3-VL-2B support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Grok 4.6

Text
Images
Audio
Video

LFM3-VL-2B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Grok 4.6 is licensed under a proprietary license, while LFM3-VL-2B uses LFM Open License v1.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Grok 4.6

Proprietary

Closed source

LFM3-VL-2B

LFM Open License v1.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Grok 4.6 was released on 2026-08-12, while LFM3-VL-2B was released on 2026-10-27.

LFM3-VL-2B is 3 months newer than Grok 4.6.

Grok 4.6

Aug 12, 2026

2 months ago

LFM3-VL-2B

Oct 27, 2026

1 weeks ago

2mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Grok 4.6 has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2026-02-01, while LFM3-VL-2B's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Grok 4.6's training data extends to 2026-02-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without LFM3-VL-2B's cutoff date.

Grok 4.6

Feb 2026

LFM3-VL-2B

—

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Grok 4.6 and LFM3-VL-2B side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Grok 4.6
✓ Preferred
LFM3-VL-2B
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Grok 4.6 vs LFM3-VL-2B.

Which is better, Grok 4.6 or LFM3-VL-2B?

Grok 4.6 leads the LLM Stats Score 44.3 to 15.5. Grok 4.6 is made by xAI and LFM3-VL-2B is made by Liquid AI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Grok 4.6 compare to LFM3-VL-2B in benchmarks?

Grok 4.6 scores CursorBench v3.2: 69.9%, DeepSWE 1.1: 65.9%, FrontierCode: 61.3%, AA-Index: 61.0%, GDPval-AA: 58.4%. LFM3-VL-2B scores DocVQA: 96.7%, CountBench: 93.0%, ChartQA: 92.7%, RefCOCO-avg: 90.5%, POPE: 88.7%.

What are the context window sizes for Grok 4.6 and LFM3-VL-2B?

Grok 4.6 supports 500K tokens and LFM3-VL-2B supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Grok 4.6 and LFM3-VL-2B?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (44.3 vs 15.5), licensing (Proprietary vs LFM Open License v1.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Grok 4.6 and LFM3-VL-2B?

Grok 4.6 is developed by xAI and LFM3-VL-2B is developed by Liquid AI.