The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Grok 4.6 vs Muse Glimmer-30B

Comparing Grok 4.6 and Muse Glimmer-30B across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

xAI · Meta · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Grok 4.6 and Muse Glimmer-30B trade strengths across price, capabilities, and technical limits. The better choice depends on the workload.

Based on current benchmark, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Grok 4.6

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Aug 2026

Choose Muse Glimmer-30B

  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Grok 4.6
xAI
Muse Glimmer-30B
Meta
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
$2.00 / M
— / M
Output price
$6.00 / M
— / M
Context window
500,000
—
Released
Aug 2026
Aug 2026
License
Proprietary
Apache 2.0

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

No common benchmarks found

Grok 4.6 and Muse Glimmer-30Bdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Arena Performance

Playground indexes and blind preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Grok 4.6 specifies input context (500,000 tokens).

xAI
Grok 4.6
Input500,000 tokens
Output- tokens
Meta
Muse Glimmer-30B
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Tue Aug 25 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Both Grok 4.6 and Muse Glimmer-30B support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Grok 4.6

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Muse Glimmer-30B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Grok 4.6 is licensed under a proprietary license, while Muse Glimmer-30B uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Grok 4.6

Proprietary

Closed source

Muse Glimmer-30B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Grok 4.6 was released on 2026-08-12, while Muse Glimmer-30B was released on 2026-08-10.

Grok 4.6 is 0 month newer than Muse Glimmer-30B.

Grok 4.6

Aug 12, 2026

1 weeks ago

2d newer
Muse Glimmer-30B

Aug 10, 2026

2 weeks ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Grok 4.6 has a knowledge cutoff of 2026-02-01, while Muse Glimmer-30B has a cutoff of 2026-01-04.

Grok 4.6 has more recent training data (up to 2026-02-01), making it potentially better informed about events through that date compared to Muse Glimmer-30B (2026-01-04).

Grok 4.6

Feb 2026

1 mo newer
Muse Glimmer-30B

Jan 2026

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Grok 4.6 and Muse Glimmer-30B side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Grok 4.6
✓ Preferred
Muse Glimmer-30B
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Grok 4.6 vs Muse Glimmer-30B.

Which is better, Grok 4.6 or Muse Glimmer-30B?

Grok 4.6 (xAI) and Muse Glimmer-30B (Meta) each have strengths in different areas. Compare their benchmark scores, pricing, context windows, and capabilities above to determine which fits your needs.

How does Grok 4.6 compare to Muse Glimmer-30B in benchmarks?

Grok 4.6 scores CursorBench v3.2: 69.9%, DeepSWE 1.1: 65.9%, FrontierCode: 61.3%, AA-Index: 61.0%, GDPval-AA: 58.4%. Muse Glimmer-30B scores AIME 2026: 94.7%, Siren AgentDojo Utility: 94.2%, GPQA: 83.5%, AA-LCR: 80.0%, CharXiv-R: 78.8%.

What are the context window sizes for Grok 4.6 and Muse Glimmer-30B?

Grok 4.6 supports 500K tokens and Muse Glimmer-30B supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Grok 4.6 and Muse Glimmer-30B?

Key differences include licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Grok 4.6 and Muse Glimmer-30B?

Grok 4.6 is developed by xAI and Muse Glimmer-30B is developed by Meta.

Related comparisons