The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Grok 4.7 vs Mercury 2

Grok 4.7 leads the LLM Stats Score 48.5 to 23.6. Mercury 2 is 8.0x cheaper per token.

xAI · Inception · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Grok 4.7 leads the overall LLM Stats Score 48.5 to 23.6, ranking #23 overall.

On price, Mercury 2 is roughly 8.0x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Grok 4.7 also accepts a larger context window (500,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Grok 4.7

  • overall performance matters — it scores 48.5 and ranks #23 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you process long inputs — it offers a 500,000 token context window
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

Choose Mercury 2

  • cost matters — it's about 8.0x cheaper per token

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
48.5
#23
23.6
#176
37.4
#69
22.6
#171
40.1
#13
12.6
#146
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
Input price
$2.00 / M
$0.25 / M
Output price
$6.00 / M
$0.75 / M
Context window
500,000
128,000

Individual benchmarks

23 reported for Grok 4.7 · 6 for Mercury 2

No common benchmarks found

Grok 4.7 and Mercury 2don't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Mercury 2 costs less

For input processing, Grok 4.7 ($2.00/1M tokens) is 8.0x more expensive than Mercury 2 ($0.25/1M tokens).

For output processing, Grok 4.7 ($6.00/1M tokens) is 8.0x more expensive than Mercury 2 ($0.75/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Grok 4.7 is more expensive than Mercury 2.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Tue Sep 22 2026 • llm-stats.com
xAI
Grok 4.7
Input tokens$2.00
Output tokens$6.00
Best providerxAI
Inception
Mercury 2
Input tokens$0.25
Output tokens$0.75
Best providerInception
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Grok 4.7 accepts 500,000 input tokens compared to Mercury 2's 128,000 tokens. Only Mercury 2 specifies output context (8,192 tokens).

xAI
Grok 4.7
Input500,000 tokens
Output- tokens
Inception
Mercury 2
Input128,000 tokens
Output8,192 tokens
Tue Sep 22 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Grok 4.7 supports multimodal inputs, whereas Mercury 2 does not.

Grok 4.7 can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Grok 4.7

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Mercury 2

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Grok 4.7

Proprietary

Closed source

Mercury 2

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Grok 4.7 was released on 2026-09-21, while Mercury 2 was released on 2026-02-24.

Grok 4.7 is 7 months newer than Mercury 2.

Grok 4.7

Sep 21, 2026

1 days ago

6mo newer
Mercury 2

Feb 24, 2026

7 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Grok 4.7 has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2026-06-01, while Mercury 2's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Grok 4.7's training data extends to 2026-06-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Mercury 2's cutoff date.

Grok 4.7

Jun 2026

Mercury 2

Provider Availability

Grok 4.7 is available from xAI. Mercury 2 is available from Inception.

Grok 4.7

xai logo
xAI
Input Price:Input: $2.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $6.00/1M

Mercury 2

inception logo
Inception
Input Price:Input: $0.25/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.75/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Grok 4.7 and Mercury 2 side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Grok 4.7
✓ Preferred
Mercury 2
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Grok 4.7 vs Mercury 2.

Which is better, Grok 4.7 or Mercury 2?

Grok 4.7 leads the LLM Stats Score 48.5 to 23.6. Grok 4.7 is made by xAI and Mercury 2 is made by Inception. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Grok 4.7 compare to Mercury 2 in benchmarks?

Grok 4.7 scores BixBench MCQ: 88.4%, WMDP-Bio: 88.1%, WMDP-Cyber: 88.1%, WMDP-Chem: 84.9%, CyberGym: 80.3%. Mercury 2 scores AIME 2025: 91.1%, GPQA: 74.0%, IFBench: 71.0%, LiveCodeBench: 67.0%, Tau2 Airline: 53.0%.

Is Grok 4.7 cheaper than Mercury 2?

Mercury 2 is 8.0x cheaper for input tokens. Grok 4.7 costs $2.00/M input and $6.00/M output via xai. Mercury 2 costs $0.25/M input and $0.75/M output via inception.

What are the context window sizes for Grok 4.7 and Mercury 2?

Grok 4.7 supports 500K tokens and Mercury 2 supports 128K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Grok 4.7 and Mercury 2?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (48.5 vs 23.6), context window (500K vs 128K), input pricing ($2.00 vs $0.25/M), multimodal support (yes vs no). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Grok 4.7 and Mercury 2?

Grok 4.7 is developed by xAI and Mercury 2 is developed by Inception.