The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Grok 4.7 vs MiniMax M2.1

Grok 4.7 leads the LLM Stats Score 48.5 to 31.9. MiniMax M2.1 is 5.7x cheaper per token.

xAI · MiniMax · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Grok 4.7 leads the overall LLM Stats Score 48.5 to 31.9, ranking #22 overall.

On price, MiniMax M2.1 is roughly 5.7x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

MiniMax M2.1 also accepts a larger context window (1,000,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Grok 4.7

  • overall performance matters — it scores 48.5 and ranks #22 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

Choose MiniMax M2.1

  • cost matters — it's about 5.7x cheaper per token
  • you process long inputs — it offers a 1,000,000 token context window
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Grok 4.7
xAI
MiniMax M2.1
MiniMax
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
48.5
#22
31.9
#112
Reasoning
37.4
#68
32.2
#106
Coding
40.1
#13
22.2
#85
Agents
36.3
#18
18.1
#73
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
$2.00 / M
$0.30 / M
Output price
$6.00 / M
$1.20 / M
Context window
500,000
1,000,000

Individual benchmarks

23 reported for Grok 4.7 · 25 for MiniMax M2.1

No common benchmarks found

Grok 4.7 and MiniMax M2.1don't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

MiniMax M2.1 costs less

For input processing, Grok 4.7 ($2.00/1M tokens) is 6.7x more expensive than MiniMax M2.1 ($0.30/1M tokens).

For output processing, Grok 4.7 ($6.00/1M tokens) is 5.0x more expensive than MiniMax M2.1 ($1.20/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Grok 4.7 is more expensive than MiniMax M2.1.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Mon Sep 21 2026 • llm-stats.com
xAI
Grok 4.7
Input tokens$2.00
Output tokens$6.00
Best providerxAI
MiniMax
MiniMax M2.1
Input tokens$0.30
Output tokens$1.20
Best providerMiniMax
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

MiniMax M2.1 accepts 1,000,000 input tokens compared to Grok 4.7's 500,000 tokens. Only MiniMax M2.1 specifies output context (1,000,000 tokens).

xAI
Grok 4.7
Input500,000 tokens
Output- tokens
MiniMax
MiniMax M2.1
Input1,000,000 tokens
Output1,000,000 tokens
Mon Sep 21 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Grok 4.7 supports multimodal inputs, whereas MiniMax M2.1 does not.

Grok 4.7 can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Grok 4.7

Text
Images
Audio
Video

MiniMax M2.1

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Grok 4.7 is licensed under a proprietary license, while MiniMax M2.1 uses MIT.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Grok 4.7

Proprietary

Closed source

MiniMax M2.1

MIT

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Grok 4.7 was released on 2026-09-21, while MiniMax M2.1 was released on 2025-12-23.

Grok 4.7 is 9 months newer than MiniMax M2.1.

Grok 4.7

Sep 21, 2026

0 days ago

9mo newer
MiniMax M2.1

Dec 23, 2025

9 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Grok 4.7 has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2026-05-01, while MiniMax M2.1's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Grok 4.7's training data extends to 2026-05-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without MiniMax M2.1's cutoff date.

Grok 4.7

May 2026

MiniMax M2.1

—

Provider Availability

Grok 4.7 is available from xAI. MiniMax M2.1 is available from MiniMax.

Grok 4.7

xai logo
xAI
Input Price:Input: $2.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $6.00/1M

MiniMax M2.1

minimax logo
MiniMax
Input Price:Input: $0.30/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.20/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Grok 4.7 and MiniMax M2.1 side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Grok 4.7
✓ Preferred
MiniMax M2.1
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Grok 4.7 vs MiniMax M2.1.

Which is better, Grok 4.7 or MiniMax M2.1?

Grok 4.7 leads the LLM Stats Score 48.5 to 31.9. Grok 4.7 is made by xAI and MiniMax M2.1 is made by MiniMax. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Grok 4.7 compare to MiniMax M2.1 in benchmarks?

Grok 4.7 scores BixBench MCQ: 88.4%, WMDP-Bio: 88.1%, WMDP-Cyber: 88.1%, WMDP-Chem: 84.9%, CyberGym: 80.3%. MiniMax M2.1 scores VIBE Web: 91.5%, VIBE Android: 89.7%, VIBE: 88.6%, MMLU-Pro: 88.0%, VIBE iOS: 88.0%.

Is Grok 4.7 cheaper than MiniMax M2.1?

MiniMax M2.1 is 6.7x cheaper for input tokens. Grok 4.7 costs $2.00/M input and $6.00/M output via xai. MiniMax M2.1 costs $0.30/M input and $1.20/M output via minimax.

What are the context window sizes for Grok 4.7 and MiniMax M2.1?

Grok 4.7 supports 500K tokens and MiniMax M2.1 supports 1.0M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Grok 4.7 and MiniMax M2.1?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (48.5 vs 31.9), context window (500K vs 1.0M), input pricing ($2.00 vs $0.30/M), multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Proprietary vs MIT). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Grok 4.7 and MiniMax M2.1?

Grok 4.7 is developed by xAI and MiniMax M2.1 is developed by MiniMax.

Related comparisons