The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Grok 4.7 vs Qwen2.5 32B Instruct

Grok 4.7 leads the LLM Stats Score 48.5 to 7.7.

xAI · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Grok 4.7 leads the overall LLM Stats Score 48.5 to 7.7, ranking #22 overall.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Grok 4.7

  • overall performance matters — it scores 48.5 and ranks #22 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

Choose Qwen2.5 32B Instruct

  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Grok 4.7
xAI
Qwen2.5 32B Instruct
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
48.5
#22
7.7
#287
Reasoning
37.4
#68
7.2
#285
Coding
40.1
#13
9.4
#175
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
$2.00 / M
— / M
Output price
$6.00 / M
— / M
Context window
500,000
—

Individual benchmarks

23 reported for Grok 4.7 · 18 for Qwen2.5 32B Instruct

No common benchmarks found

Grok 4.7 and Qwen2.5 32B Instructdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Grok 4.7 specifies input context (500,000 tokens).

xAI
Grok 4.7
Input500,000 tokens
Output- tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5 32B Instruct
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Mon Sep 21 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Grok 4.7 supports multimodal inputs, whereas Qwen2.5 32B Instruct does not.

Grok 4.7 can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Grok 4.7

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen2.5 32B Instruct

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Grok 4.7 is licensed under a proprietary license, while Qwen2.5 32B Instruct uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Grok 4.7

Proprietary

Closed source

Qwen2.5 32B Instruct

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Grok 4.7 was released on 2026-09-21, while Qwen2.5 32B Instruct was released on 2024-09-19.

Grok 4.7 is 24 months newer than Qwen2.5 32B Instruct.

Grok 4.7

Sep 21, 2026

0 days ago

2.0yr newer
Qwen2.5 32B Instruct

Sep 19, 2024

2.0 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Grok 4.7 has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2026-05-01, while Qwen2.5 32B Instruct's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Grok 4.7's training data extends to 2026-05-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Qwen2.5 32B Instruct's cutoff date.

Grok 4.7

May 2026

Qwen2.5 32B Instruct

—

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Grok 4.7 and Qwen2.5 32B Instruct side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Grok 4.7
✓ Preferred
Qwen2.5 32B Instruct
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Grok 4.7 vs Qwen2.5 32B Instruct.

Which is better, Grok 4.7 or Qwen2.5 32B Instruct?

Grok 4.7 leads the LLM Stats Score 48.5 to 7.7. Grok 4.7 is made by xAI and Qwen2.5 32B Instruct is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Grok 4.7 compare to Qwen2.5 32B Instruct in benchmarks?

Grok 4.7 scores BixBench MCQ: 88.4%, WMDP-Bio: 88.1%, WMDP-Cyber: 88.1%, WMDP-Chem: 84.9%, CyberGym: 80.3%. Qwen2.5 32B Instruct scores GSM8k: 95.9%, HumanEval: 88.4%, HellaSwag: 85.2%, BBH: 84.5%, MBPP: 84.0%.

What are the context window sizes for Grok 4.7 and Qwen2.5 32B Instruct?

Grok 4.7 supports 500K tokens and Qwen2.5 32B Instruct supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Grok 4.7 and Qwen2.5 32B Instruct?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (48.5 vs 7.7), multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Grok 4.7 and Qwen2.5 32B Instruct?

Grok 4.7 is developed by xAI and Qwen2.5 32B Instruct is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.

Related comparisons