The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Grok 4.7 vs Qwen3.7-Plus

Grok 4.7 leads the LLM Stats Score 48.5 to 42.6. Qwen3.7-Plus is 5.4x cheaper per token.

xAI · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Grok 4.7 leads the overall LLM Stats Score 48.5 to 42.6, ranking #23 overall.

On price, Qwen3.7-Plus is roughly 5.4x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Qwen3.7-Plus also accepts a larger context window (1,000,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Grok 4.7

  • overall performance matters — it scores 48.5 and ranks #23 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes coding and agents — it leads those capability indexes
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

Choose Qwen3.7-Plus

  • cost matters — it's about 5.4x cheaper per token
  • you process long inputs — it offers a 1,000,000 token context window

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Grok 4.7
xAI
Qwen3.7-Plus
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
48.5
#23
42.6
#49
Reasoning
37.4
#69
43.0
#43
Coding
40.1
#13
30.7
#52
Agents
36.1
#19
24.3
#55
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
$2.00 / M
$0.32 / M
Output price
$6.00 / M
$1.28 / M
Context window
500,000
1,000,000

Individual benchmarks

23 reported for Grok 4.7 · 70 for Qwen3.7-Plus

No common benchmarks found

Grok 4.7 and Qwen3.7-Plusdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Qwen3.7-Plus costs less

For input processing, Grok 4.7 ($2.00/1M tokens) is 6.3x more expensive than Qwen3.7-Plus ($0.32/1M tokens).

For output processing, Grok 4.7 ($6.00/1M tokens) is 4.7x more expensive than Qwen3.7-Plus ($1.28/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Grok 4.7 is more expensive than Qwen3.7-Plus.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Tue Sep 22 2026 • llm-stats.com
xAI
Grok 4.7
Input tokens$2.00
Output tokens$6.00
Best providerxAI
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3.7-Plus
Input tokens$0.32
Output tokens$1.28
Best providerTogether
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Qwen3.7-Plus accepts 1,000,000 input tokens compared to Grok 4.7's 500,000 tokens. Only Qwen3.7-Plus specifies output context (65,536 tokens).

xAI
Grok 4.7
Input500,000 tokens
Output- tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3.7-Plus
Input1,000,000 tokens
Output65,536 tokens
Tue Sep 22 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both Grok 4.7 and Qwen3.7-Plus support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Grok 4.7

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen3.7-Plus

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Grok 4.7

Proprietary

Closed source

Qwen3.7-Plus

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Grok 4.7 was released on 2026-09-21, while Qwen3.7-Plus was released on 2026-05-31.

Grok 4.7 is 4 months newer than Qwen3.7-Plus.

Grok 4.7

Sep 21, 2026

1 days ago

3mo newer
Qwen3.7-Plus

May 31, 2026

3 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Grok 4.7 has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2026-06-01, while Qwen3.7-Plus's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Grok 4.7's training data extends to 2026-06-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Qwen3.7-Plus's cutoff date.

Grok 4.7

Jun 2026

Qwen3.7-Plus

—

Provider Availability

Grok 4.7 is available from xAI. Qwen3.7-Plus is available from Together, Fireworks.

Grok 4.7

xai logo
xAI
Input Price:Input: $2.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $6.00/1M

Qwen3.7-Plus

together logo
Together
Input Price:Input: $0.32/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.28/1M
fireworks logo
Fireworks
Input Price:Input: $0.40/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.60/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Grok 4.7 and Qwen3.7-Plus side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Grok 4.7
✓ Preferred
Qwen3.7-Plus
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Grok 4.7 vs Qwen3.7-Plus.

Which is better, Grok 4.7 or Qwen3.7-Plus?

Grok 4.7 leads the LLM Stats Score 48.5 to 42.6. Grok 4.7 is made by xAI and Qwen3.7-Plus is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Grok 4.7 compare to Qwen3.7-Plus in benchmarks?

Grok 4.7 scores BixBench MCQ: 88.4%, WMDP-Bio: 88.1%, WMDP-Cyber: 88.1%, WMDP-Chem: 84.9%, CyberGym: 80.3%. Qwen3.7-Plus scores IFEval: 94.6%, MMLU-Redux: 94.5%, HMMT Feb 26: 92.9%, MRCR v2: 91.7%, OmniDocBench 1.5: 91.4%.

Is Grok 4.7 cheaper than Qwen3.7-Plus?

Qwen3.7-Plus is 6.3x cheaper for input tokens. Grok 4.7 costs $2.00/M input and $6.00/M output via xai. Qwen3.7-Plus costs $0.32/M input and $1.28/M output via together.

What are the context window sizes for Grok 4.7 and Qwen3.7-Plus?

Grok 4.7 supports 500K tokens and Qwen3.7-Plus supports 1.0M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Grok 4.7 and Qwen3.7-Plus?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (48.5 vs 42.6), context window (500K vs 1.0M), input pricing ($2.00 vs $0.32/M). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Grok 4.7 and Qwen3.7-Plus?

Grok 4.7 is developed by xAI and Qwen3.7-Plus is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.

Related comparisons