Hermes 3 405B vs LongCat-2.5
LongCat-2.5 leads the LLM Stats Score 49.7 to 3.8. LongCat-2.5 is 1.9x cheaper per token.
Nous Research · Meituan · Updated for 2026
Which is better?
LongCat-2.5 leads the overall LLM Stats Score 49.7 to 3.8, ranking #22 overall.
On price, LongCat-2.5 is roughly 1.9x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.
LongCat-2.5 also accepts a larger context window (1,048,576 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.
Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.
Choose Hermes 3 405B
- you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune
Choose LongCat-2.5
- overall performance matters — it scores 49.7 and ranks #22 on LLM Stats
- your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
- cost matters — it's about 1.9x cheaper per token
- you process long inputs — it offers a 1,048,576 token context window
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped Nov 2026
At a glance
The differences that matter most.
Capability indexes
Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks
Individual benchmarks
13 reported for Hermes 3 405B · 23 for LongCat-2.5
Hermes 3 405B and LongCat-2.5don't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.
Human preference
Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
For input processing, Hermes 3 405B ($1.00/1M tokens) is 3.3x more expensive than LongCat-2.5 ($0.30/1M tokens).
For output processing, Hermes 3 405B ($1.00/1M tokens) is 1.2x cheaper than LongCat-2.5 ($1.20/1M tokens).
In conclusion, Hermes 3 405B is more expensive than LongCat-2.5.*
* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens
Model Size
Parameter count comparison
LongCat-2.5 has 1195.0B more parameters than Hermes 3 405B, making it 295.1% larger.
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
LongCat-2.5 accepts 1,048,576 input tokens compared to Hermes 3 405B's 131,072 tokens. Both models can generate responses up to 131,072 tokens.
Input capabilities
Documented input modalities across available providers
LongCat-2.5 supports multimodal inputs, whereas Hermes 3 405B does not.
LongCat-2.5 can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.
Hermes 3 405B
LongCat-2.5
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
Hermes 3 405B was released on 2024-10-09, while LongCat-2.5 was released on 2026-11-01.
LongCat-2.5 is 25 months newer than Hermes 3 405B.
Oct 9, 2024
2.1 years ago
Nov 1, 2026
1 weeks ago
2.1yr newerKnowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.
Unable to compare the recency of their training data.
Provider Availability
Hermes 3 405B is available from DeepInfra. LongCat-2.5 is available from Meituan.
Hermes 3 405B
LongCat-2.5
Outputs Comparison
Judge for yourself.
Run your own prompts against Hermes 3 405B and LongCat-2.5 side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.
FAQ
Common questions about Hermes 3 405B vs LongCat-2.5.