Hermes 3 70B vs Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking leads the LLM Stats Score 26.7 to 4.0. Hermes 3 70B is 1.7x cheaper per token.
Nous Research · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026
Which is better?
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking leads the overall LLM Stats Score 26.7 to 4.0, ranking #151 overall.
In the 2 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking wins 2; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.
On price, Hermes 3 70B is roughly 1.7x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking also accepts a larger context window (262,144 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.
Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.
Choose Hermes 3 70B
- cost matters — it's about 1.7x cheaper per token
Choose Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking
- overall performance matters — it scores 26.7 and ranks #151 on LLM Stats
- your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
- you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 2 of 2 exact shared results
- you process long inputs — it offers a 262,144 token context window
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2025
At a glance
The differences that matter most.
Capability indexes
Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks
Individual benchmarks
17 reported for Hermes 3 70B · 67 for Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking
Hermes 3 70B outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking is better at 2 benchmarks (MMLU, MMLU-Pro).
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.
Human preference
Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
For input processing, Hermes 3 70B ($0.70/1M tokens) is 1.6x more expensive than Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking ($0.45/1M tokens).
For output processing, Hermes 3 70B ($0.70/1M tokens) is 5.0x cheaper than Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking ($3.49/1M tokens).
In conclusion, Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking is more expensive than Hermes 3 70B.*
* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens
Model Size
Parameter count comparison
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking has 166.0B more parameters than Hermes 3 70B, making it 237.1% larger.
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking accepts 262,144 input tokens compared to Hermes 3 70B's 131,072 tokens. Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking can generate longer responses up to 262,144 tokens, while Hermes 3 70B is limited to 131,072 tokens.
Input capabilities
Documented input modalities across available providers
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking supports multimodal inputs, whereas Hermes 3 70B does not.
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.
Hermes 3 70B
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking
License
Usage and distribution terms
Both models are licensed under Apache 2.0.
Both models share the same licensing terms, providing consistent usage rights.
Apache 2.0
Open weights
Apache 2.0
Open weights
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
Hermes 3 70B was released on 2024-08-15, while Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking was released on 2025-09-22.
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking is 13 months newer than Hermes 3 70B.
Aug 15, 2024
2.1 years ago
Sep 22, 2025
1.0 years ago
1.1yr newerKnowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.
Unable to compare the recency of their training data.
Provider Availability
Hermes 3 70B is available from DeepInfra. Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking is available from DeepInfra, Novita.
Hermes 3 70B
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking
Outputs Comparison
Judge for yourself.
Run your own prompts against Hermes 3 70B and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.
FAQ
Common questions about Hermes 3 70B vs Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking.