DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash vs Hermes 3 70B
DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash leads the LLM Stats Score 51.8 to 4.0. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash is 2.1x cheaper per token.
DeepSeek · Nous Research · Updated for 2026
Which is better?
DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash leads the overall LLM Stats Score 51.8 to 4.0, ranking #13 overall.
In the 1 individual benchmarks reported for both models, DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash wins 1; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.
On price, DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash is roughly 2.1x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.
DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash also accepts a larger context window (1,040,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.
Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.
Choose DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
- overall performance matters — it scores 51.8 and ranks #13 on LLM Stats
- your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
- you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 1 of 1 exact shared results
- cost matters — it's about 2.1x cheaper per token
- you process long inputs — it offers a 1,040,000 token context window
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026
Choose Hermes 3 70B
- you want predictable pricing at $0.70/M input and $0.70/M output
At a glance
The differences that matter most.
Capability indexes
Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks
Individual benchmarks
20 reported for DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash · 17 for Hermes 3 70B
DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash outperforms in 1 benchmarks (GPQA), while Hermes 3 70B is better at 0 benchmarks.
DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.
Human preference
Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
For input processing, DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash ($0.22/1M tokens) is 3.2x cheaper than Hermes 3 70B ($0.70/1M tokens).
For output processing, DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash ($0.66/1M tokens) is 1.1x cheaper than Hermes 3 70B ($0.70/1M tokens).
In conclusion, Hermes 3 70B is more expensive than DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash.*
* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens
Model Size
Parameter count comparison
DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash has 693.2B more parameters than Hermes 3 70B, making it 990.3% larger.
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash accepts 1,040,000 input tokens compared to Hermes 3 70B's 131,072 tokens. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash can generate longer responses up to 393,216 tokens, while Hermes 3 70B is limited to 131,072 tokens.
Input capabilities
Documented input modalities across available providers
DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash supports multimodal inputs, whereas Hermes 3 70B does not.
DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.
DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
Hermes 3 70B
License
Usage and distribution terms
DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash is licensed under MIT, while Hermes 3 70B uses Apache 2.0.
License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.
MIT
Open weights
Apache 2.0
Open weights
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash was released on 2026-09-10, while Hermes 3 70B was released on 2024-08-15.
DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash is 25 months newer than Hermes 3 70B.
Sep 10, 2026
1 weeks ago
2.1yr newerAug 15, 2024
2.1 years ago
Knowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.
Unable to compare the recency of their training data.
Provider Availability
DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash is available from Fireworks, DeepInfra, DeepSeek, Novita. Hermes 3 70B is available from DeepInfra.
DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
Hermes 3 70B
Outputs Comparison
Judge for yourself.
Run your own prompts against DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash and Hermes 3 70B side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.
FAQ
Common questions about DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash vs Hermes 3 70B.