Hy3 vs Solar Pro 4
Hy3 leads the LLM Stats Score 43.2 to 35.3. Hy3 is 2.1x cheaper per token.
Tencent · Upstage · Updated for 2026
Which is better?
Hy3 leads the overall LLM Stats Score 43.2 to 35.3, ranking #40 overall.
In the 5 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Hy3 wins 5; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.
On price, Hy3 is roughly 2.1x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.
Solar Pro 4 also accepts a larger context window (524,288 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.
Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.
Choose Hy3
- overall performance matters — it scores 43.2 and ranks #40 on LLM Stats
- your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
- you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 5 of 5 exact shared results
- cost matters — it's about 2.1x cheaper per token
- you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune
Choose Solar Pro 4
- you process long inputs — it offers a 524,288 token context window
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped Aug 2026
At a glance
The differences that matter most.
Capability indexes
Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks
Individual benchmarks
31 reported for Hy3 · 9 for Solar Pro 4
Hy3 outperforms in 5 benchmarks (AA-LCR, BrowseComp, GPQA, SWE-Bench Verified, Terminal-Bench 2.1), while Solar Pro 4 is better at 0 benchmarks.
Hy3 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.
Human preference
Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
For input processing, Hy3 ($0.14/1M tokens) is 2.1x cheaper than Solar Pro 4 ($0.30/1M tokens).
For output processing, Hy3 ($0.58/1M tokens) is 2.1x cheaper than Solar Pro 4 ($1.20/1M tokens).
In conclusion, Solar Pro 4 is more expensive than Hy3.*
* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
Solar Pro 4 accepts 524,288 input tokens compared to Hy3's 262,144 tokens. Hy3 can generate longer responses up to 262,144 tokens, while Solar Pro 4 is limited to 131,072 tokens.
License
Usage and distribution terms
Hy3 is licensed under Apache 2.0, while Solar Pro 4 uses a proprietary license.
License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.
Apache 2.0
Open weights
Proprietary
Closed source
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
Hy3 was released on 2026-07-06, while Solar Pro 4 was released on 2026-08-06.
Solar Pro 4 is 1 month newer than Hy3.
Jul 6, 2026
2 months ago
Aug 6, 2026
1 months ago
1mo newerKnowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.
Unable to compare the recency of their training data.
Provider Availability
Hy3 is available from DeepInfra. Solar Pro 4 is available from Upstage.
Hy3
Solar Pro 4
Outputs Comparison
Judge for yourself.
Run your own prompts against Hy3 and Solar Pro 4 side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.
FAQ
Common questions about Hy3 vs Solar Pro 4.