The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Hy4 preview vs MAI-Code-1.1-Flash

Hy4 preview leads the LLM Stats Score 51.1 to 28.3.

Tencent · Microsoft · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Hy4 preview leads the overall LLM Stats Score 51.1 to 28.3, ranking #14 overall.

In the 1 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Hy4 preview wins 1; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Hy4 preview

  • overall performance matters — it scores 51.1 and ranks #14 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 1 of 1 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Aug 2026
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

Choose MAI-Code-1.1-Flash

  • you want predictable pricing at $0.20/M input and $1.20/M output

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Hy4 preview
Tencent
MAI-Code-1.1-Flash
Microsoft
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
51.1
#14
28.3
#126
Reasoning
50.7
#11
28.0
#122
Coding
39.8
#12
19.1
#102
Agents
36.3
#14
10.4
#107
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
1 of 1
0 of 1
Input price
— / M
$0.20 / M
Output price
— / M
$1.20 / M
Context window
—
256,000

Individual benchmarks

32 reported for Hy4 preview · 2 for MAI-Code-1.1-Flash

1 shared

Hy4 preview outperforms in 1 benchmarks (Terminal-Bench 2.1), while MAI-Code-1.1-Flash is better at 0 benchmarks.

Hy4 preview significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Fri Sep 04 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

632.0B diff

Hy4 preview has 632.0B more parameters than MAI-Code-1.1-Flash, making it 458.0% larger.

Tencent
Hy4 preview
770.0Bparameters
Microsoft
MAI-Code-1.1-Flash
138.0Bparameters
770.0B
Hy4 preview
138.0B
MAI-Code-1.1-Flash

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only MAI-Code-1.1-Flash specifies input context (256,000 tokens).

Tencent
Hy4 preview
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Microsoft
MAI-Code-1.1-Flash
Input256,000 tokens
Output- tokens
Fri Sep 04 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

MAI-Code-1.1-Flash supports multimodal inputs, whereas Hy4 preview does not.

MAI-Code-1.1-Flash can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Hy4 preview

Text
Images
Audio
Video

MAI-Code-1.1-Flash

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Hy4 preview is licensed under Apache 2.0, while MAI-Code-1.1-Flash uses a proprietary license.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Hy4 preview

Apache 2.0

Open weights

MAI-Code-1.1-Flash

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Hy4 preview was released on 2026-08-28, while MAI-Code-1.1-Flash was released on 2026-08-11.

Hy4 preview is 1 month newer than MAI-Code-1.1-Flash.

Hy4 preview

Aug 28, 2026

1 weeks ago

2w newer
MAI-Code-1.1-Flash

Aug 11, 2026

3 weeks ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Hy4 preview and MAI-Code-1.1-Flash side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Hy4 preview
✓ Preferred
MAI-Code-1.1-Flash
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Hy4 preview vs MAI-Code-1.1-Flash.

Which is better, Hy4 preview or MAI-Code-1.1-Flash?

Hy4 preview leads the LLM Stats Score 51.1 to 28.3. Hy4 preview is made by Tencent and MAI-Code-1.1-Flash is made by Microsoft. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Hy4 preview compare to MAI-Code-1.1-Flash in benchmarks?

Hy4 preview scores GPQA: 92.3%, Terminal-Bench 2.1: 85.4%, WideSearch: 83.9%, MCP Atlas: 83.7%, SWE-bench Multilingual: 82.9%. MAI-Code-1.1-Flash scores SWE-Bench Verified: 72.6%, Terminal-Bench 2.1: 62.9%.

What are the context window sizes for Hy4 preview and MAI-Code-1.1-Flash?

Hy4 preview supports an unknown number of tokens and MAI-Code-1.1-Flash supports 256K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Hy4 preview and MAI-Code-1.1-Flash?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (51.1 vs 28.3), multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (Apache 2.0 vs Proprietary). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Hy4 preview and MAI-Code-1.1-Flash?

Hy4 preview is developed by Tencent and MAI-Code-1.1-Flash is developed by Microsoft.

Related comparisons